AndSource of Channel Post for December 16, 2022. The source spoke about serious “showdowns” between the Federal Chamber of Lawyers (FPA) and the FSB because of the events in Ukraine. On February 27, a harsh statement appeared on the website of the FPA condemning the actions against the “fraternal people” and calling for “stop hostilities.” It was signed by FPA President Yuri Pilipenko and such members of the FPA Council as Grib, Reznik, Semenyako, Klyuvgant, Dobrynin. The very next day, a second appeal appeared, signed by other members of the council, stating that “the bar is out of politics. But she is united with her country and her citizens.” At the same time, a member of the council, Galoganov, managed to put his signature under both the first and second appeals. True, his signature disappeared from the condemning appeal. And then all these appeals disappeared from the FPA website. The source says that this happened after a relevant conversation with Yuri Pilipenko. And it was preceded by a report by FSB officers seconded to the Ministry of Justice that during the “special operation” the FPA decided to play politics in a very inappropriate way, and President Pilipenko completely condemns the decision of the country's leadership. The latter now literally shudders at any mention of this story.
***
A source of the Cheka-OGPU spoke about the criminal case of embezzlement of budget money for the 2018 World Cup through the contractors of Channel One. Deputy General Director Alexander Faifman left the country back in January 2022, after a criminal case was opened, the first suspects were interrogated, and shortly before a witness report was issued against him and it was decided to conduct searches at his addresses. According to information from the interlocutor, even before the initiation of a criminal case, the investigation received all approvals for communication with Konstantin Ernst. An employee came to him, and the head of the TV channel answered questions. He said that he did not know about the fraud and that his deputy was in charge of everything. Merged by the chief, Faifman tried to find protection in the synagogue, where he was already helped to resolve issues with the Federal Tax Service and the Accounts Chamber. But even there, despite many years of friendship, as in the case of Ernst, they disowned him. Alexander tried to find intermediaries through whom he wanted to compensate for the damage, even offered the boss to win everything back, but it was too late.
***
For three years in a row, the owners and top managers of coal terminals of RMPP LLC, Rostov Port JSC and VTP LLC have ignored the prosecutor's office, which has revealed many systemic violations of environmental legislation here, without taking any measures to eliminate them. The essence of the claims against coal terminals located on the territory of the Rostov Multimodal Sea Port is that as a result of coal transshipment in an open way, environmental legislation is violated. The terminals of RMPP LLC, Rostov Port JSC and VTP LLC do not even have a permit from the state environmental review, which, in general, cannot be obtained, since the most elementary things are not here. In particular, back in 2019, an audit revealed that there were no “structures at the coal terminals in the port that ensure the protection of the water body from pollution, clogging, silting and depletion of water … Untreated sewage storm water is discharged along the terrain into the water body of the river. Don”. However, coal dust pollutes not only water, but also the air in and around the port. The company, which has last year's revenue of a billion rubles and a net profit of 110 million rubles, regularly receives dozens of comments based on the results of inspections by the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources, but does not consider it necessary to eliminate them. Here, they equally ignore both the protection of the environment and the health of the city's residents, including its own employees, and the instructions of regulatory government agencies, up to the prosecutor's office. It is obvious that so far even the fines and court decisions initiated by the environmental authorities cannot reason with the owners and managers of coal terminals to comply with the law. In the end, the public took over. The Moscow Society for the Protection of Consumer Rights and Environmental Protection “Princip” filed a lawsuit and intends to seek the closure of coal terminals, since in the absence of positive conclusions from the state environmental review, there is every reason to consider the activities of LLC “RMMP” JSC “Rostov Port” and LLC “VneshTorgPort” on transshipment of coal illegal.
***
A source of the VChK-OGPU announced the return of the head of the Security Service of Inter RAO, who was removed due to his connection with Karina Tsurkan, to the post. Earlier, we published recordings of Turcan's telephone conversations, where instead of the names of the top manager, nicknames sounded. For example, the chairman of the board of the PJSC was renamed by Karina into “junnata”, she called Igor Sechin “brother”. But the head of the Security and Regime Block of Inter RAO in the past, Major General of the FSB Dmitry Kuznetsov, did not enjoy such respect, his nickname was “asshole”. Turcan, in conversations with her frequent interlocutor, influential businessman Viktor Drigenich, made it clear that the head of the Security Service received a salary from her. According to the interlocutor, immediately after the case of Karina Turcan, accused of espionage, became known to the general public, Kuznetsov was “hidden.” The high-ranking employee, under whom, in fact, all the leaks happened, was returned to the roots – until recently, he was responsible for security on the perimeter of objects. Then, in 2018, in place of Kuznetsov, the management appointed Sergey Makarov, deputy director of the subsidiary LLC Inter RAO – Procurement Management Center for economic security, in place of Kuznetsov. Recently he died from a long illness and in his place the leadership agreed to the return of Dmitry Kuznetsov.
***
Gazprombank's money is cashed out through the wife of the debtor Andrey Shandalov, Maria Shandalov. As the Cheka of the OGPU found out, for the purpose of hiding cash flows and assets from creditors of the IT company OPTIMA, Andrey Shandalov after the theft in 2011. 35 million dollars from Gazprombank concluded a marriage contract with his wife on 10/30/2013. The essence of which is that if the property is registered in the name of one of the spouses, then this is his/her property. Thus, the property nominally registered in the name of Maria Shandalova according to the criminal plan of Andrey Shandalov will be protected from claims against him by creditors from Gazprombank. Doubtful postings of Maria Shandalova are offered, obviously made in the interests of a criminal group in order to conceal and legalize property. •Loan between Maria Shandalova and Shevotsukov Stanislav Pshimafovich for 12 million rubles, •Lease agreement between Maria Shandalova and Victoria Korzun for 25 million rubles, •Agreement for the sale and purchase of a land plot by Maria Shandalova in Shchelkovo – 3 in the amount of 12 million. rub., •Certificate of the right to a house with an area of 657 sq.m. in the elite village of Gorki-8 (with an estimated cost of $4 million). •Agreement on the transfer of debt for 12 million rubles. •Document on the transfer of payments from Elena Efimovna Sargsyan (presumably the mother of Maria Shandalova) to Maria Alexandrovna Shandalova. Despite the fact that creditors of the OPTIMA IT company are hunting for Andrey Shandalov in the amount of 8 billion rubles. and $35 million in debt to Gazprombank, he has a credit card and an account with Sberbank. Of course, the Shandalovs would not have been able to get away from creditors represented by Gazprombank in such a banal way if they had not been protected by the well-known raider group Quorum Debt Management Artem Zuev and Zoya Galeeva. See the remaining documents here
***
In continuation of the publications of October 1 and 7, 2022 on corruption in the Ministry of Education and Science. The VChK-OGPU has some interesting documents. On April 14, 2022, Minister Falkov signed Order No. 339 on the abolition of the Project Activities Department (PDD) and launched the process of laying off employees, including those who were members of the commission for assessing fulfilled obligations under the state contract with Skolkovo. On June 1, 2022, by order N 491, a new department was created under the leadership of Gvozdeva NM, and on June 3, 2022, letter N MN-10/1773 was signed stating that Gvozdeva’s official and functional duties had not changed and she was assigned another class rank. Notifications of the reduction were also received by employees who were part of the commission for assessing fulfilled obligations under the Civil Code with Skolkovo (to which Gvozdeva NM is so reverent). The reduction was carried out in connection with a significant change in the functional and job responsibilities of employees and dragged on for 6 months. Obviously, the employees were “held back” until they were accepted under a government contract (and it was in July), and then they were reduced due to Gvozdeva’s inconvenient comments on the report on the execution of the government contract and their refusal to accept outstanding work. Recall that at the present time an audit is underway under the state contract with Skolkovo. Further, on June 3, 2022, letter N MN-10/1773 was signed, saying that Gvozdeva’s official and functional duties had not changed, on the basis of which (among other things) she was assigned the next class rank, which contradicts the grounds for the reduction. How did it happen that the functionality of employees, and hence the department as a whole, has changed, but Gvozdeva’s functionality has not? I would like to ask: the reduction was carried out with significant violations of the law and NM achieved the departure of people objectionable to it because of disloyalty to the report? Or did Gvozdeva deliberately provide false information about the status of her official and functional duties, forgetting to mention the changes? Gvozdeva has her own vision on the procedure for reducing and (managing) pressure on employees. After all, friendship with Skolkovo is on the agenda.
***
As it became known to the Cheka-OGPU, two criminal cases were initiated against the deputy head of the department for work with personnel of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for Moscow, Colonel Pavel Paranosenkov. He is suspected of making him pay a monthly tribute of 5 thousand rubles for each subordinate of another policeman – deputy chief technical support and prompt response UEBiPK Moscow Sharov. According to the investigation, Paranosenkov found out that Sharov was helping his subordinates to pass their final vocational training tests and decided to offer him a deal: he did not report anything about Sharov's activities, and Sharov paid him 5,000 rubles every month for each employee. True, the cooperation did not last long, Paranosenkov received about 200 thousand rubles. Cases were initiated under paragraph 5 of Art. 190 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and part 3 of Art. 190. As previously told by the Cheka-OGPU, claims also arose against Ruslan Ermakov, head of the department for work with personnel of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow. He was even detained and interrogated, but immediately released and sent on vacation. Ermakov, together with Pavel Paranosenkov, agreed to raise an unofficial tariff for the delivery of standards by employees.
***
Ukrenergo has declared an emergency after today's Russian strikes on Ukrainian territory (pictured and video). “As a result of rocket attacks from Russia, more than 50% of the consumption of the Unified Energy System was lost,” Ukrenergo said.
***
Pay attention to Natalia Bogatkina, a judge of the Arbitration Court of the North-West. Murmansk swindlers who stole someone else's property were beaten up in six (!) courts. And only Bogatkina went to meet them. But what about the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 2011 on the consistency of judicial acts? The resolutions, we recall, entered into force in six judicial instances. And all of them are not in favor of the applicants. Bogatkina is obliged to be guided by the decisions of her colleagues? Yes – as long as she follows the letter of the law! But Natalya Yuryevna apparently follows her corrupt instinct and acts in the interests of the Murmansk swindlers. Therefore, on November 24, by decision of the Arbitration Court of the North-West, the case was sent for review. And where are the side judges looking – E.N. Bychkov and A.A. Chernyshov? Is the “revolution” in domestic jurisprudence taking place with their tacit consent or active criminal participation? There is nowhere to put stigma on Bogatkina after the scandals in Perm, where she worked as a judge. How did she manage to seep into St. Petersburg, and even for a promotion?
***
Prigozhin decided to make fun of the story with a certain explosion of a parcel in the hands of the head of the “Russian House” in the Central African Republic and Prigozhin's subordinate Dmitry Sytoy. The latter received a concussion. Prigozhin was generally carried away by African games. Orkhan Dzhemal was killed for real. I would like to ask the ICR, what about the case of the murder of Dzhemal, Rastorguev and Radchenko? Still no investigative actions are being carried out after the clothes of the dead were mysteriously burned in the Central African Republic?
***
According to a source of the Cheka-OGPU, travel abroad for the New Year holidays for employees and their families was banned not only in the state-owned Rosneft and Gazprom, but also in Rostec. In particular, in the production subsidiaries of the state corporation. This is also due to the fact that many employees have access to state secrets with a form of clearance that allows travel, and fly for the New Year holidays, including massively to the UAE, where, according to the management of the state corporation, they can “incorrectly dispose of the information they have about Russian industry and its state against the backdrop of the war.
***
Let's correct a few colleagues from the Cheka-OGPU regarding Ernst's participation in the criminal case on the fact of embezzlement on the broadcast of the 2018 World Cup events. As it became known from the representative of Channel One, Ernst's meeting with the investigation took place on the day of the search, respectively, after the initiation. Previously, at least in the editorial office, they never talked about the visits of the “boss” to the authorities. And there were no reasons. On December 16, 2021, operatives and investigators came to Channel One with a seizure of documents related to Az Art TV LLC. At the entrance, near the turnstiles, they refused to let employees in without being accompanied by channel representatives, despite the fact that the documents were in order. Law enforcement officers behaved culturally, they didn’t “carry out” the doors, they didn’t make a scandal, but obediently waited for the security guard. He led the delegation upstairs to the conference room next to Ernst's office. The chief came immediately with two of his deputies – Irina Prokhorova and Alexander Faifman. After that, Ernst was given information on the fact of initiating a criminal case against Starodubtseva and Vaganov. At this moment, Faifman became nervous, his forehead was covered with sweat, through the mask it was clear how his face began to turn red, and his hands were shaking. He began to look around the room nervously, trying not to look the investigators in the eye. Faifman's channel has never been seen like this, he is always a calm, reserved and intelligent person, says the source. It was here that Ernst declared that they did not know anything about Az Art TV. Then Irina escorted law enforcement officers to another room and provided information about the documents requested by the investigation. Other sources close to Faifman reported that he hardly appeared on the channel for the next week. He went into a severe depression and swelled in the residence of friends near Moscow. Almost didn't dry out. He did not appear at his house in Akulinino. On December 23, he flew from Russia to Dubai on a private jet.
***
There are different opinions about this news. But we are not surprised, because such a ban is in the logic of our state-owned companies and their leaders. Any trips abroad have long required coordination, albeit informal. But in Rosneft, as they say, the leaders were forbidden even to leave Moscow. Interestingly, does the near Moscow region count? ✈️????????
***
Funny news from colleagues: the contractor Energy Construction, controlled by the Kovalchuk clan, almost in one gulp took almost 2 billion rubles from his usual patrimony – St. Petersburg State Unitary Enterprise TEK. For understanding – what is happening in the country and in the world throughout the year carried extremely serious costs for the clans close to the throne. The end of the year is the best time to slightly make up for losses from the bins of the homeland that are accustomed to development. We think that in the remaining half a month we will see more interesting examples of budgetary “addition”
***
The Cheka-OGPU has all the documents for the parcel that exploded today in the hands of the head of the Russian House Dmitry Sytin in the Central African Republic. The parcel was sent from Togo on December 12th. The sender is someone Sevillano Mingueza Alex The recipient is “Maison Russie” (“Russian House”). Other similarities about the parcel – later.
***
The VChK-OGPU continues to publish documents on a parcel that was sent by a certain Sevillano Mingueza Alex from Togo to the Russian House in the Central African Republic and exploded in the hands of the head of the house, Dmitry Sytin. On the package with the “bomb” it was indicated that there was a “flash drive” inside, its entire package was 0.368 g. The parcel passed all stages of checks: collection, processing, transportation, delivery.
Source
