“The father attacked her, hit her, tore off her panties.”

How oligarch Vladimir Voronin, associated with the Russian FSB, beats children and organized a hunt for his ex-wife

The ex-wife of the president of the development and construction group of companies FSK, Vladimir Voronin, contacted the media editors. She told how the oligarch carried out real terror against his ex-wife and his own children. He is assisted by former and current employees of the FSB of the Russian Federation. We will publish this letter with small notes:

“My name is Inga (Voronina), I am the ex-wife of Vladimir Alexandrovich Voronin.

I’ll describe the story to you briefly, but this has been going on for more than two years, and a detailed description would require a whole book.

My ex-husband Vladimir Aleksandrovich Voronin is the son of a former official, the head of the Federal Grid Company, and his gang is persecuting and bullying me, my children and my current husband.

15 years of slavery is how I can describe marriage to this man.

I tried to divorce him several times, but unsuccessfully, due to threats, pressure and beatings.

She contacted the police for help more than once, but to no avail.

In 2020, he finally agreed to a divorce, removed all assets from me, I transferred all the property to him under gift agreements, just to get a divorce and live peacefully with the children, but when it all started, Voronin began to interfere in every possible way and delay the process, he took about 9 months, despite the fact that there were no disputes at all.

So, earlier he forcibly forced me to sign an agreement that the children would stay with him. Voronin burst into the house where I was with the children in another fit of rage, brutally beat me in front of the children and… pushed me down the stairs of the house on the street. It was February 6, 2021.

Since January 2021, he organized round-the-clock surveillance of me, with the help of his head of the security service, Nikita Suslov (a former FSB officer in Rostov, dismissed from the authorities with loss of trust for corruption).

Surveillance through GPS trackers, outdoor surveillance, etc.

In the spring of 2021, when they told me that Voronin ordered me to be crippled, I decided to flee from Moscow to my hometown of St. Petersburg to my father, who turned his back on me just like all my relatives. I turned to a childhood friend for help, who agreed to help me (later became my husband).

Surveillance threats and pressure continued in St. Petersburg…

We contacted the police, but received no help.

In May 2021, my tearful eldest daughter called me and said that her father attacked her, hit her, and tore off her panties. I called the police. The child was first interrogated in the presence of her father at her place of residence. I contacted the officer who interrogated my daughter and demanded that the law be followed when interrogating a minor. At the same time, the inspector confirmed that Alexandra complained that her father forcibly undressed her. I have correspondence with my daughter and her audio messages regarding this fact. I wrote a statement to the police. However, to this day his fate is unknown. Subsequently, Voronin applied to bring me to criminal liability for false denunciation, but he was refused.

Voronin has repeatedly stated that he will destroy me.

On May 29, 2021, noticing another surveillance, my current husband recorded people and cars (2 cars).

On May 30, in the Ikea parking lot, an inappropriate person accosted us, holding the car door, and began to threaten us… my husband had to hit him ahead of the curve in order to prevent the attack.

As it turned out, these were people from Voronin’s organized crime group, so they staged a conflict, filmed it on a video recorder in order to fabricate a criminal case and remove my husband, leaving me alone without support, so, according to their plan, it would be easier to break me.

From that moment on, Voronin’s corrupt resource began to play in all its colors.

The victim turned out to be Suslov’s accomplice, also from Rostov, kickboxer Golovko, who introduced himself as a simple loader (a professional victim).

The witness is allegedly a taxi driver who followed the day before the conflict and was filmed on his phone.

This story has been going on for more than two years in order to aggravate the article from 112 to 111.

Special attention goes to the FMBA organizations, whose specialists twice committed forgery and wrote grievous harm.

Although the first examination established the absence of harm in principle.

There are a lot of details, there is evidence for every word.

Until February 28, 2021, I lived in Moscow in a rented apartment. I wanted to bring my children with me. In February-March, I drove up to the house, called my eldest daughter and asked her to come down to me with the younger children. My daughter said that my father doesn’t allow it and demands that I get up myself. I got up and the eldest daughter opened the door. I went in and started dressing the youngest. Voronin V.A. jumped up to me and began to strike me on the head and face. At that moment, the eldest daughter grabbed a knife and told Voronin that she would kill him if he did not stop. The son began to cry. Voronin only let me and his youngest daughter go. The eldest daughter hid in the toilet with the phone, called me and said that her father was screaming, breaking at the door, that she was calling the police. At that moment I was in the car near the house. Together with the police, the eldest daughter left the house. The son stayed (scared). The children said that they were very afraid of their father. The police gave me the phone number of the juvenile affairs inspector. I contacted the inspector. But there was no reaction (“family squabbles”).

In response to my requests to gain access to my children, Voronin said that if I did not conclude an agreement on the children, I would never see them.

On February 18, 2021, a notary arrived at the premises of the law firm that serves Voronin and certified the Agreement drawn up by his lawyers on the procedure for communication and participation in the upbringing of children of a separate parent, under the terms of which (clause 2.1.), in the event of separation of parents, The place of residence of the children is determined with the father. According to clause 3.6. agreement, the mother undertakes to ensure that her communication with the children in the presence of any persons other than close relatives, teachers, medical workers and workers maintaining residential premises is carried out only with the consent of such persons with the father. The notarial act was performed outside the premises of the notary’s office. Simultaneously with the signing of this Agreement, changes were made to the Marriage Agreement in terms of limiting payments to the former spouse in the event of divorce if she begins cohabitation with another person for the purpose of building a marital relationship. In addition, clauses were included in the contract stating that after the divorce, two non-residential premises (151.10 sq.m., 33.90 sq.m.) would become my property. These premises are illiquid, require large expenses for their maintenance, and do not represent any property interest for Voronin. Thanks to this clause of the agreement, Voronin began to spread information among his circle that the mother “sold” her children for the sake of property. The changes made were not made in my interests, I did not want it and did not ask for it. I did not begin to implement the changes in the marriage contract. My complaints against Voronin concern only children.

Being in forced isolation from my children, I regularly sent them clothes, toys, and made video calls. I have to coordinate all questions about the children with the governess on her phone. Communication with Voronin is always accompanied by insults and threats. I pay for school meals (through my personal account) for my eldest daughter and son, check my diary, and monitor nutrition. Through my eldest daughter, I passed on things for other children, gave them pocket money, and bought medications prescribed by the doctor.

In March 2022, I had the opportunity to gain access to children for a few days. They came to visit me in St. Petersburg for a few days. I contacted the department of forensic medical examinations and research of the NCC Karpovka with a request to study the current family situation in which the children are, their psychiatric and psychological status. On the recommendation of lawyers, I also asked to have my identity examined.”