The source of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU toldthat’s moving across countries Anatoly Chubais decided on the end point of his journey – he decided to settle in England. A place to stay has already been chosen. This is one of the most expensive and prestigious private villages of St. George’s Hill in Surrey. There’s a huge mansion there Boris Mints, which in fact is the holder and custodian of the Chubais family office and assets for gigantic sums. Mintz bought a mansion next door and undertook expensive renovations, telling people it was for his son.
However, it has now become clear that Mintz’s neighbor will not be a relative, but Anatoly Chubais, and it is he who is destined for the mansion in St. George’s Hill.
As reported the Cheka-OGPUinitially Chubais planned to settle in Italy, where earlier for him acquired a mansion another holder of Chubais’ assets Oleg Kiselev (aka Gedaliah Waxer). But after the story of the poisoning in Italy, Chubais decided that it would be safer in England.
Over the past 2 (Two) years, publications about various financial “scams” in relation to or with the participation of Anatoly Chubais have systematically appeared in the Russian media.
Assessing the activities of Anatoly Chubais more carefully, it should be noted that in the vast majority of financial “scams” he continues to remain in the shadows.
“Planting material” are most of his deputies, friends, acquaintances, but not him.
In continuation of publications on the site rucriminal.info dated August 07, 2022 “It’s much tastier than paying a million” and dated August 29, 2022 “We are poor people, don’t give us all the profit”at the disposal of the source of information was another audio recording revealing the source of the declared profitability and financing of the life of Anatoly Chubais on the territory of the Russian Federation.
The participants of this meeting, already known from previous publications, are:
1. Ilya Gulin — financial director of companies Mintsev;
2. Sergey Krychenko – Founder and General Director of the Russian Family Office of Anatoly Chubais;
3. Olga Butkova — financial director of the Russian family office of Anatoly Chubais, […]
Sergey Krychenko: we said that you are ready to fulfill 12 (meaning million rubles), and we told you at the last meeting that we can even meet 10 (meaning million rubles). We are talking about this without having received a final verdict from the leader (Anatoly Chubais) who is waiting for me tomorrow
Olga Butkova: well, suddenly something is added, from what we do not know
Sergey Krychenko: yes, it is quite possible that the first half of the year will change, in which direction I do not know, hardly in a smaller direction. January (it means 2016) we completely closed, thank God everything is fine with us. And now let’s go, get a piece of paper with your questions, we will now make ends meet. We now have a connection between cash requests and ownership structure (assuming “LCD Alterations”). Now I am explaining that we are structuring our property (“LCD Alterations”) correctly. We give, we take for debts, we buy, right?
Ilya Gulin: Yes
Sergey Krychenko: and all this should be accompanied by even some financial transactions, there is some connection here, so we want to establish this connection and understand at what moment, what we need, how much we need.
Olga Butkova: now I turn on. In fact, before we talked, the cost of these Alterations (“LCD Alterations”) was estimated at around 8,000,000 US dollars, now this is a different rate, I considered the budget to be 520,000,000 rubles, respectively, we have “non-cash” money until they are gone. It is supposed that this will be “non-cash” money that you will return as part of the loan and then the same money will be returned somehow in cash, I don’t understand how it is. Dima (Dmitry Mints) will receive 520 (520,000,000 rubles under the contract for the sale of ZhK Peredelki concluded between him and Anatoly Chubais).
Ilya Gulin: which is my default. The amount of money is returned to the “non-cash” account (by Anatoly Chubais) for the loan, of this money the part that you evaluate (assuming the assessment of ZhK Peredelok) goes to Dima (Dmitry Mints), at this moment we default to that this money is credited to a certain virtual account of the “boss” (Anatoly Chubais), that is, they return to him (Anatoly Chubais) in a non-cash form
Olga Butkova: but in non-cash, not in cash? This is important.
Ilya Gulin: we believe that a certain account with the “main” (Anatoly Chubais) with us (Mintsev) has increased by this amount, then from where the money is debited every time you need something. Then look, for example, you say we need to get this money, in fact, the money that originally belonged to him, his “white” money, “ok”, then we confirm this there and give it away in some range, because in any case, the equipment there will need to be discussed.
Olga Butkova: why am I asking this question, because when we discussed with him (Anatoly Chubais), he says I don’t care about this topic because this is a technical amount (the amount of 520,000,000 rubles is implied). I explain to him (Anatoly Chubais) that this technical amount should go from your personal account and, accordingly, this amount will be less on a non-cash account
Ilya Gulin: Yes, this is true and we need to agree on what to do with this (meaning this money) to leave as a reserve for personal future plans. This is the subject of some discussion. This is his (Anatoly Chubais) part of the “white” money transformed into income.
Sergey Krychenko: fix the question for tomorrow, what to do with these “grandmothers” (it is implied with 520,000,000 rubles)
Olga Butkova: I have another question about non-cash money
Sergey Krychenko: for loan repayment?
Olga Butkova: Yes. I don’t even have how much to repay the loan to Boris Iosifovich (Mints) how much to repay the loan Ruben Karlenovich (Vardanyan)there is a remainder
Sergey Krychenko: well, let’s go through these loans now
Ilya Gulin: what is the remainder?
Olga Butkova: Well, 210 (it means million rubles) You gave us at the end of the year (it means 2015), here, and we took 480 (it means million rubles)
Ilya Gulin: oh, I don’t know about that
Olga Butkova: how do you not know? You know perfectly well that we paid for the PAI (meaning the PAI of the Closed-End Mutual Fund “Perspective Companies”), but we took a loan
Ilya Gulin: I returned the money to them (meant to Ruben Vardanyan)
Olga Butkova: You yes to them, and we then? You returned the money to them, of course, definitely
Ilya Gulin: that is, you don’t actually owe them, you owe them only according to documents
Olga Butkova: according to the documents, and anyway, this money should be debited from a non-cash account, here
Sergey Krychenko: request of the client (Anatoly Chubais) should I ask Ruben (Vardanyan)?
Olga Butkova: Why am I using “non-cash” money, because the deadline for repaying the loan to him (Ruben Vardanyan) is the month of July (2016 is implied)
Sergey Krychenko: when we removed the issue of repaying the loan that we gave to Boris Iosifovich (Mints)
Ilya Gulin: when all this was happening, the most important ones told me that they agreed, Mints agreed with AB (Anatoly Borisovich Chubais) that it would be 3-4 months, I tell you directly verbatim. I now live in this logic
Olga Butkova: well, yes, we did the loan agreement until October 01 (assuming 2016)
Sergey Krychenko: You said 3-4 months is excellent, you don’t have any technical failures or indications, do we live in the same logic?
Ilya Gulin: I don’t have any other information so far.
Sergey Krychenko: wonderful, three, four months we report January, February, March, well, the end of April, the beginning of May.
Ilya Gulin: well apparently yes
Sergey Krychenko: that means the end of April, the beginning of May, the forecast, while we think so. Now they are there “boss” (Anatoly Chubais) will think
Ilya Gulin: for me, too, so that you understand, this will be a certain starting point on which I do not influence in any way, as soon as it happens, so that not only I have a headache on this topic. I’m just going to provide further equipment here, who, as it looms on the horizon
Sergey Krychenko: Dima (Dmitry Mints) correctly heard that the figure we called 12 – 10 (meaning million rubles), how we fit because of the course, this is just our figure, this is not his (Anatoly Chubais) figure, otherwise he (Dmitry Mints) is on me directly pounced
Ilya Gulin: Dima (Dmitry Mints) attacked me in the same way, I told him that it was you who originally voiced it. Sergei (Sergey Krychenko) made his own calculations and said that so far, according to their calculations, this is so much, but with a reservation for a possible change in the amount. That’s exactly what I said
Sergey Krychenko: and I, after all, didn’t insure my “liver” with this very reservation, but it actually was because when we last discussed the budget for the year, drew approximately the expenses that await us, he (Anatoly Chubais) already sketched an adjustment there such not weak from where we have appeared in February under 356 (thousands of US dollars are meant). Yes?
Olga Butkova: it’s not february it’s april
Sergey Krychenko: 356
Olga Butkova: what 356?
Sergey Krychenko: Dollars, thousand
Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?
Sergey Krychenko: about february “cache”
Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?
Sergey Krychenko: about cash
Olga Butkova: “cash” is generally we have February of these 30 and March 60 (thousands of US dollars are implied). We do not have such amounts in crazy dollars
Sergey Krychenko: in February we don’t have such a huge amount?
Olga Butkova: No, we don’t have a huge amount. Why do you think so?
Ilya Gulin: the task is to understand the budget and say, comment on what we can in this regard. The number has two parts. I’m just summarizing. The first part, you and I there, plus, minus “shot down” found an understanding, sort of like your vision with our capabilities, sort of. There is a second part that we do not know, respectively, as soon as it is clear, we will think of something about it. Therefore, as of today, we have a consensus.
Olga Butkova: and accordingly there is a “non-cash” part which we also understand that while we are in this …, and also which we do not understand
Ilya Gulin: in continuation of the dialogue on numbers, please, in the near future, it’s not clear today, formulate a request for February so that I also release the “cache”
Olga Butkova: I have formulated it, I can just tell you the amount for today
Ilya Gulin: let’s
Olga Butkova: I have 26 million
Ilya Gulin: rubles?
Olga Butkova: Yes
Ilya Gulin: and somehow it is split up within a month?
Sergey Krychenko: as you prefer
Olga Butkova: whatever is more convenient for you, we will arrange. We will distribute when we receive
Ilya Gulin: if you do not have a binding, I will think
Sergey Krychenko: we try so that all our expenses, namely ours that we plan, “suck”, think over, vary in the range between the 25th and 30th of each month. There is a force majeure, an SMS message with an order to give tomorrow
Ilya Gulin: force majeure is understandable. Another clarifying question, since we are now interacting with you only on this part, here is the conditional budget that was previously there, those amounts that we are now talking about, they are also part of this budget
Sergey Krychenko: Yes, sure. We are only talking about “nanal” and this
Ilya Gulin: and this is it. This is relatively speaking the February need
Sergey Krychenko: Yes
Olga Butkova: Yes. The whole common part and this is the budget, I share it non-cash / cash
Sergey Krychenko: it means that now, in order to simply understand the logic in which we live, we minimize those expenses (non-cash expenses are implied), therefore, the load on the “nal” part has increased greatly and significantly, very much in order to save money … This is the logic simply
Ilya Gulin: this is understandable