More and more police officers and entrepreneurs are asking a reasonable question. And who really runs the Ministry of Internal Affairs? Monastyrsky or Yegor Bodrov? Personnel appointments – through Bodrov. The shadow “economy” of the Ministry of Internal Affairs – through Bodrov. The investigation is through Bodrov. At the same time, Bodrov manages to maintain an amazing non-publicity. Although, in the Ministry of Internal Affairs he is remembered quite well. Ever since the time when Bodrov “ate” at the Kiev railway station as deputy head of the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine on the South-Western Railway. And he tried to “nail down” the station bandit Bagiev, nicknamed “Babay”. Finally succeeded. Remarkably, “Babai” still controls the Kyiv railway station, writes the ORD.
Then Bodrov became the head of the department of the Kyiv regional UBOP, and not weakly “rose” on fraudulent schemes on the ground. Bodrov used his official position and connections with bank employees for personal enrichment. Illiquid land was pledged as collateral, receiving credit money for nominees. Naturally, then no one repaid these loans, and banks suffered losses. While Mr. Bodrov “put together” a fairly good capital of several million dollars.
He was in Bodrov's biography around the scandalous loan from Ukreximbank. People's Deputy Valeriy Sterniychuk published quite interesting audio recordings. Yegor Bodrov, one of the advisers to the Minister of the Interior, also “flared up” on them. He turned out to be the main generator of ideas on how to “cut the dough together” by leaking information about the state bank and having direct access to law enforcement agencies. Valery Sterniychuk also publishes films on which Bodrov recalls his partners and persons with whom he is in a relationship, these are: 1. Igor Valerievich (obviously, Kolomoisky). According to Bodrov, he is offering him $700,000. It is clear that Igor Valeryevich interceded for the “Ukrainian” side. 2. Judges of the district courts and the court of appeal, who decided on Bodrov's appeals in the interests of Teder. 3. Law enforcement officers who either open or close cases at Bodrov's command. 4. Employees of the state bank who gave Bodrov some important classified information. 5. Unidentified Pasha, who offered Bodrov $2 million to sell himself to Adamovsky, but Bodrov considered that this was not enough.
Teder, by the way, is a very interesting fruit with a branched business in the Crimea occupied by the Russian Federation.
However, these “incomes” of Bodrov cannot be compared with the income that Bodrov received during the “billing” of top government officials of the Yanukovych era .
We quote the GPU help:
“The group included: 1) Aleksey Vasilyevich Baganets – Deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine (according to the order of the Acting Prosecutor General of Ukraine Guzyr V.P. on the distribution of functional duties between the Deputy Prosecutor General of 10.03.2015, supervised the Chief Investigator of the GPU Department (this redistribution of duties of the Deputy Prosecutor General was carried out in the absence of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Shokin V.M.). Baganets O.V. signed the procedural documents necessary to close criminal proceedings, reclassify the charges to less serious ones. In addition, in case of refusal of the investigators to comply unlawful instructions to close proceedings, retrain, change the measure of restraint, Baganets O.V. made a decision to replace them; patronage the last one. The specified employee of the prosecutor's office directly supervised the activities of the investigators of the GPU.
Personally or through his deputy, he carried out extortion and received unlawful benefits from representatives of those suspected of committing criminal offenses, initiated the registration of custom criminal proceedings in order to further receive unlawful benefits for their closure. Through his deputy, he provided investigators with unlawful instructions, including on behalf of O.V. Baganets; 3) Truba Roman Mikhailovich – Deputy Head of the Main Investigation Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine – Head of the Investigation Department of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine.
Confidant and godfather of Shcherbina I.V. On instructions and in the interests of the latter, he carried out extortion and received unlawful benefits from representatives of those suspected of committing criminal offenses, initiated the registration of custom criminal proceedings with the aim of further obtaining unlawful benefits for their closure, provided investigators with unlawful instructions. At the request of Shcherbina I.V., for a monetary reward, he prepared the documents necessary to evade the ex-Minister of Finance (2012-2014) Yu.V. Kolobov. from criminal liability. Through an employee of the Prosecutor General's Office Yasenitsky Yu.I. provided Romanyak M.M. extracts from the Unified State Register of Pre-trial Investigations for their further use in the formation of the line of defense by Kolobov's lawyers Yu.V. In 2017, he was appointed Director of the State Bureau of Investigation; 4) Mikhail Mikhailovich Romanyak – during personal meetings, he introduced himself as an assistant to the Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of Ukraine, and informed individuals that he was seconded to the Presidential Administration from the Foreign Intelligence Service and had the military rank of Major General. The specified person acted as an intermediary between Bagants A.V., Shcherbina I.V., Truba R.M. and representatives of the suspects directly carried out extortion and received unlawful benefits.
Romanyak M.M. maintained relations with the head of the Main Investigation Department of the Security Service of Ukraine Vovk V.V., the deputy head of the State Guard Department of Ukraine Dakhnovsky V.A., the Chairman of the State Migration Service Radutny S.I. and other persons from people's deputies, civil servants, law enforcement officers, business representatives. In addition, in order to raise his own rating among his entourage, Romanyak M.M. in conversations, he indicated that he was on friendly terms with the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Shokin V.M., which in fact did not correspond to reality; 5) Kvasnevskaya Natalya Dmitrievna – Judge of the Higher Specialized Court for the Consideration of Civil and Criminal Cases, a close relationship of Romanyak M.M.
Together with the latter, she acted as an intermediary in extorting unlawful benefits from representatives of the former Minister of Finance Yu.V. Kolobov. for resolving the issue of his evasion of criminal liability and extradition to Ukraine. Daughter of Kvasnevskaya N.D. Daria, at the request of her mother, personally flew to Spain in order to provide legal assistance to the ex-Minister of Finance Kolobov Yu.V.; 6) Rafalskaya Inna Vladislavovna – Chairman of the Council of Advocates of the city of Kyiv, a close relationship of Kvasnevskaya N.D. Represented the interests of Kolobov Y.V., acted as an intermediary in the transfer of funds to Truba R.M., Shcherbina I.V. and Baganets O.V. with assistance in resolving the issue of evasion Kolobov Yu.V. from criminal liability and extradition to the territory of Ukraine; 7) Bodrov Egor Evgenievich – head of the department of the Organized Crime Control Department of the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in the Kyiv region, a close connection of Romanyak M.M. On behalf of the latter, he carried out extortion of illegal benefits.
Within the framework of criminal proceedings No. 42014000000001613 Bodrova E.E. was detained by employees of the Security Service of Ukraine in one of the hotels in the Kyiv region. During a personal search at Bodrov E.E. a hard drive was seized, on which information was stored taken from a large number of broken electronic mailboxes, including top officials of Ukraine of the Yanukovych regime and one of the leaders of the DPR terrorist organization Pushilin D.V. Software for unauthorized access to electronic mailboxes was also detected.
In addition, in the course of undercover investigative actions, it was established that before the arrest, Bodrov E.E. sent from his own email address to D.V. Pushilin’s email address. a letter with a proposal to sell compromising materials he has regarding the leadership of the state and law enforcement agencies of Ukraine. Bodrov E.E. was held in custody on charges of robbery, assistance to the activities of a terrorist organization and extortion.
After the appointment of Shcherbina I.V. to the post of head of the Main Investigation Department of the GPU, and Pipes R.M. to the position of his deputy and, accordingly, the reinstatement of Bagants A.V. full control over the investigation of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, these persons, at the request of Romanyak M.M. provided the investigator with instructions on taking measures to dismiss Bodrov E.E. from custody and subsequent closure of criminal proceedings against him. After the investigator refused to comply with the specified illegal instructions of Shcherbina I.V. and Truba R.M. entrusted the investigation to another investigator.
After the replacement of the investigator, these persons prepared a report addressed to the Prosecutor General of Ukraine on the inappropriateness of keeping Bodrov E.E. in custody and the need to close criminal proceedings on him. In addition, Truba R.M. at the direction of Shcherbina I.V. organized the delivery of Bodrov E.E. to the premises of the Main Investigation Department of the GPU, while no investigative actions were carried out with him. During his stay in the said premises, Bodrov E.E. more than an hour unofficially communicated with Baganets A.V., after which he was unlawfully given the opportunity to communicate with Romanyak M.M. Thus, in the actions of Baganets O.V., Shcherbina I.V. and Pipes R.M. there are signs of a crime under Part 2 of Art. 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “abuse of power or official position”.
In addition, data was received on the attempts of the participants of this group to assist the former Minister of Finance of Ukraine Kolobov Yu.V. in evading criminal liability and extradition in Ukraine. The Main Investigation Department of the Prosecutor General’s Office investigated criminal proceedings on the fact of embezzlement of state budget funds in the amount of UAH 220 million during the creation of a special-purpose telecommunications network (government communications) by PJSC Ukrtelecom. As part of this proceeding, a suspicion of committing a crime under Part 5 of Art. 191 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, to Yanukovych V.F., Azarov N.Ya., Kolobov Yu.V. and other former high-ranking officials. It should be noted that it was on the basis of the materials of the said proceedings that the above persons were put on the international wanted list by Interpol. Requests in other criminal proceedings were rejected by Interpol due to the presence, according to representatives of the international institute, of political motives.
According to the information received, lawyer Rafalskaya I.V., through the mediation of judge Kvasnevskaya N.D., turned to Romanyak M.M. with a request for assistance in evading criminal liability and possible extradition to the territory of Ukraine Kolobov Yu.V. After discussing this issue with Truba R.M., Shcherbina I.V. and its coordination with Baganets O.V., Romanyak M.M. reported Rafalskaya AND.The. about the need to pay 2 million US dollars to the leadership of the General Prosecutor's Office and 600 thousand US dollars for intermediary services and Kvasnevskaya N.D.
Further, Truba R.M. at the direction of Shcherbina I.V. began to take measures to isolate materials on Kolobov Yu.V. into a separate criminal proceeding, with the aim of further reclassifying the actions of the ex-minister to a less serious crime, which would allow the latter to evade extradition.
In order to resolve this issue, Shcherbina I.V. instructed Truba R.M. provide Romanyak M.M. extracts from the Unified State Register of Pre-trial Investigations and assist in the preparation of documents for use in the courts of Spain when resolving the issue of extradition of Kolobov Yu.V. Direction of the head Truba R.M. fulfilled, instructing the direct execution of the employee of the GPU Yasenitsky Yu.I. In fact, during a conversation with Yasenitsky Yu.I., Romanyak M.M. said that he works as an assistant to the Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of Ukraine and acts on his behalf. In turn, Romanyak M.M. handed over received from Yasenitsky Yu.I. materials lawyer Kolobov Yew.The. — Rafalsky I.V.
In the event that the court of Spain decides to extradite Kolobov Yu.V. and his law enforcement agencies of Ukraine, Baganets O.V. and Shcherbina I.V. planned to reclassify his actions of complicity in the embezzlement of budgetary funds on an especially large scale as negligence. After that, conclude an agreement with him on cooperation with the investigation and provide the opportunity to freely travel outside Ukraine. According to reports, part of the previously indicated funds has already been transferred to Rafalskaya I.V. Romanyak M.M., who handed them over to Truba R.M., Shcherbina I.V. and Baganets O.V.
Without a doubt, the actions of Baganets O.V., Shcherbina I.V. and Pipes R.M. could lead to significant complications in the investigation of criminal proceedings against Yanukovych V.F., Azarov M.Ya. and their possible justification in the courts. Thus, in the actions of Baganets O.V., Shcherbina I.V. and Pipes R.M. there are signs of a crime under Part 2 of Art. 364 “Abuse of power or official position” and Part 4 of Art. 368 “acceptance of an offer, promise or obtaining an unlawful benefit” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
The Main Investigation Department of the GPU is investigating criminal proceedings No. 42015000000000004, within which suspicions were announced against the former commercial director of PJSC “Centrenergo” Zhebsky A.V. and his deputy Lozitsky A.V. in the commission of a criminal offense under Part 4 of Art. 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. During the investigation, it was established that the officials and actual owners of SpetsEnergoMontazh LLC, by prior agreement with Zhebsky A.V., Lozitsky A.V. and Ivchenko A.M., directly involved in the theft of funds of PJSC “Centrenergo”, their cashing out and misappropriation. During the searches, on February 24, 2015, financial and accounting documentation, seals, etc. were seized in the office premises of Spetsenergomontazh LLC, confirming the facts of illegal activities of officials of the enterprise and Centerenergo PJSC.
By order of O.V. Baganets and Shcherbina I.V., Truba R.M. gave the order to the investigators of the GPU to take measures to remove the officials of Spetsenergomontazh LLC from the number of defendants in criminal proceedings and return the physical evidence seized during searches.
Thus, we see that in the actions of Baganets O.V., Shcherbiny I.V. and Pipes R.M. again, signs of a crime under Part 2 of Art. 364 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – “Abuse of power or official position.”
We also became aware that Shcherbina I.V. turned to Romanyak M.M. with a request to resolve the issue of rewarding him, Truba R.M. and Baganets O.V. firearms. In turn, Romanyak M.M. asked the deputy head of the UGO of Ukraine Dakhnovsky V.A. to resolve this issue. 03/06/2015 Dakhnovsky V.A. personally handed Bagants O.V. pistol “Beretta” in his office in the premises of the Main Investigation Department of the GPU. In the course of further conversations, Romanyak M.M. promised Shcherbina I.V. “give” an award pistol on the birthday of the last 04/01/2015, and then R.M. Pipe However, due to the dismissal of the latter from the prosecutor's office, such an “award” did not happen.»
I must say that the organized criminal group, which included Romanyak (nickname “MikhMikh”), Roman Mikhailyuk and Yegor Bodrov, “served” not only prosecutors. At one time, a record amount of a bribe at that time was recorded in Ukraine – $ 5 million. For them, the solvers tried to buy for a specific customer from the head of the State Property Fund of Ukraine (SPFU) the position of the director of the Odessa Port Plant, 99.5% of whose shares are owned by the state.
The authors of the combination were again the company: MikhMikh and Mikhailyuk and Bodrov. They were the ones responsible for communications. However, neither “MikhMikh” nor his accomplice appeared at the “strelka” – apparently, the boys have a good sense of smell. They sent three “ambassadors”. Which were very clearly detained by the NABU division exactly during the transfer of the first tranche of 50 thousand dollars. But … NABU did not reach Bodrov at that time.
But in 2020, Bodrov changed his specialization dramatically and became … Deputy Chairman of the Derzhgeokadastre. A very tasty post at all times. But Bodrov failed to “make money” on it, since during the next change of power he was fired. But, very soon surfaced at Monastyrsky. And then he crushed him under him.
Somehow, it’s not at all encouraging that such characters emerge in power during the war. And then there are rumors that Bodrov is going to participate in the competition for the head of NABU. Gentlemen, before allowing such citizens, you conduct a special check. You will find not only the above-mentioned art, but also very interesting relatives in Moscow. It's time to somehow clean up the power vertical. And do not let crooks into it.
Business acumen of Yarema and Co.: The prosecutor's office does not interfere with the main income
Odessa lawyer. How Andrey Kostin became the Prosecutor General and who he is
Don't “stop” smuggling: who and how controls customs and what does Seyar Kurshutov and Andrey Yermak have to do with it