Redemption of a share by Artur Urtaev from Igor Pestrikov became a waste
The investigating authorities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs opened another criminal case against the former shareholder of OJSC Solikamsk Magnesium Plant Igor Pestrikov and ex-general director of the enterprise Artur Urtaeva. They are suspected of attempted embezzlement of 2.5 billion rubles. the plant’s funds under the guise of the company’s purchase of a 25% stake in Fin-project LLC, owned by Pestrikov. It is reported by Kommersant-Prikamye.


According to the publication, the criminal case was initiated at the end of January this year. According to investigators, Igor Pestrikov decided to organize the theft of funds from the Solikamsk magnesium plant in his favor with the help of the former general director Artur Urtaev. The GSU believes that they wanted to commit embezzlement under the guise of selling SMZ 25% of Pestrikov’s shares in Fin-Project LLC. This organization controls the Lovozero Mining and Processing Plant, which is the sole supplier of loparite concentrate for the enterprise in Solikamsk.
The Solikamsk Magnesium Plant is the only producer of rare earth elements in the country and a processor of rare earth minerals. In May 2022, the Arbitration Court of the Perm Territory satisfied the claim of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation for the recovery of more than 89% of the shares into state ownership. The shares of the Fin-Project also became the property of the state. Igor Pestrikov owned a 25% stake in SMZ and a 24.99% stake in LLC. Last year, after a series of previous lawsuits, due to which Petr Kondrashev and Timur Starostin lost the opportunity to manage the enterprise, Igor Pestrikov was able to form a controlled board of directors. By the decision of this body, Artur Urtaev was appointed general director.
In a letter to Mr. Bortnikov, the former shareholder expresses his disagreement with the position of the investigation in both criminal cases. According to him, the preliminary sale and purchase agreement provided for a security deposit, but it could not be paid without the approval of the board of directors. This issue, according to Igor Pestrikov, was not brought up for discussion by this enterprise management body. In addition, the purchase and sale transaction could not take place without the appraiser’s opinion on the value of the share. Igor Pestrikov also points out that it could not happen until the other co-owners of Fin-Proekt waive their pre-emptive right to buy shares. The former shareholder also believes that if the deal were completed, then SMZ would acquire a stake in a valuable asset, thanks to which it would be able to influence the management of its sole supplier. Igor Pestrikov does not agree with the accusation of embezzlement of 250 million rubles.
Artur Urtaev, who is in a pre-trial detention center, does not admit guilt, since he considers the transfer of funds to be civil law relations. Igor Pestrikov indicates in the letter that SMZ was not damaged by this transaction, but, on the contrary, the company received a profit of about 14 million rubles. Also, Mr. Pestrikov claims that “the investigation took all measures so that the borrowed funds were not returned.” Under such measures, the former shareholder understands the arrest of his accounts and property in the amount of more than 3 billion rubles.