Shulyak reciprocated Kubrakov: the “expert” scheme is integrated into the “Great Recovery” by amendments to the tender law
Draft law No. 8202 on amendments to the law “On Public Procurement” (draft card) from the chairman of the Servant party of the people” by Elena Shulyak and her seven colleagues (including the new head of the Verkhovna Rada Budget Committee, Roksolana Podlasa), write Our Money.
The Essence the bill is as follows: allow state customers to change the essential terms of contracts for the purchase of works and services for current repairs six months after the conclusion of the agreement itself. Namely, to allow an increase in the price of construction contracts, if this increase is documented by an expert organization that has the right to conduct an examination of a construction project in accordance with the law.
The explanatory note states that this is necessary to make life easier for customers in a situation where prices for building materials are rising:
According to the forecasts of the National Bank of Ukraine, by the end of 2022, inflation will exceed 30%. So, according to the State Statistics Service of Ukraine dated 10/12/2022, in September 2022 compared to August 2022, the consumer price index amounted to 101.9%, for the period January-September 2022 – 121.8%. […] Consequently, the prices of materials continue to rise, but at the same time, the procedures defined by the procurement legislation do not allow the parties to the contract to change the price of the contract.
In practice, this means the following. Ukravtodor will have the opportunity to raise the price in tender contracts concluded before the invasion without restrictions. Good will not disappear, and you will not have to re-tender under the noses of international specialists during the “Great Recovery”.
And in cases where a new tender still has to be held, it will be possible to do so. A company “understandable” to the customer comes to the auction and quite honestly wins the auction in a desperate price cut. Really falls at a price below all competitors. And then half a year passes and brings a certificate from an expert organization that the prices in its tender contract are much lower than the current market. And again you can lift without any restrictions. At least 20%, at least 200%. For bill 8202 does not contain any ceiling.
Although even in the explanatory note, the authors of the bill refer only to a 22% increase in the prices of building materials during the year of the invasion. And some customers right now are finding opportunities to reduce the prices of building materials (for example, “The dollar prices for concrete slabs for Ukrgasdobycha have become lower than before the invasion”).
The only thing needed to accelerate prices according to this scheme is the presence of a “understandable” expert organization. And this must happen! A week ago, the Verkhovna Rada voted for Olena Shulyak's bill to create new rules of the game for expert organizations. As already reported, these rules will lead to the establishment of control over the construction market by organizations whose management has common patents for attesting experts together with People's Deputy Dmitry Isaenko (see Scheme of corruption stranglehold on the construction market #5655).
Moreover, the toxic bill was passed through the Verkhovna Rada thanks to the support of Oleksandr Kubrakov, Deputy Prime Minister for the Restoration of Ukraine. He, together with Elena Shulyaka, worked at the NGO “BRDO” before joining the civil service. Therefore, he remembers what words and arguments should be spoken in front of public organizations. But the other day I used this vocabulary to convince the RISE Ukraine coalition and the President's Office that there are no corruption threats in Shulyak's bill (see “How Deputy Prime Minister Kubrakov is trying to keep the urban planning reform from being vetoed” and “Forbes found out how Zelensky was persuaded not to veto” . scandalous law on urban planning reform”).
What to do?We offer state customers to appease their appetites for overclocking estimates. At least 50% of the price of the original agreement, as it is now provided for additional work. For greed darkens the brain too obviously.
For example, bill 8022 says that the necessary changes should be made to paragraphs 9 and 10 of the fifth part of Article 41 of the Law “On Public Procurement”.
Shulyak reciprocated Kubrakov: The “expert” scheme will be integrated into the “Great Recovery” by changes to the tender law
But these points are simply not there!
Shulyak reciprocated Kubrakov
Or one more example. In the phrase “which must be documented by the customer by an expert organization” there are no punctuation marks between the words “customer” and “expert organization”. So whose certificate then needs to cover the overclocking of the estimate – will the expert have enough papers from the customer himself? Shulyak reciprocated Kubrakov: the “expert” scheme is being integrated into the “Great Recovery” by changes to the tender law” width=”1323″ height=”256″ alt=”” />
Shulyak replied Kubrakov's reciprocity
#Corruption_Generates_Hand-Ass. Always.
Yuri Nikolov ! PART 1
Dmitry Isaenko: builder-destroyer and his 150 million in cash. PART 1
The scandalous law No. 5655 has been passed. What is known
15 members of the profile committee of the Verkhovna Rada in the interests of large developers supported the second reading of the draft law No. 5655
