The Russian soul is broad in its response to kind and unkind words, if the cup of patience is full. Undoubtedly, it was the last version of the spiritual breadth of the Russian people that the head of the Markov municipality had the “pleasure” to get acquainted with Tatiana Makarevich in the second year of management.
A massive information attack against the head of Markov began on the morning of November 20. A number of telegram channels criticized the work of the Markov administration, dissecting numerous aspects of Makarevich’s clumsy and ineffective work and organizing a real fortune-telling competition “
For a year and a half, in the role of the head of the village of Markova, Tatyana Makarevich delicately played on the nerves of the residents, me the rules of the game on the go: not keeping the given word, not fulfilling promises, ignoring requests and appeals.
And so she received a fair answer in the form of an honest, merciless Russian revolt that fell on the downcast head of the mayor.
Will Makarevich withstand the onslaught?
The answer is definitely yes. There is only one reason, but it is adamant: in order to touch the heartstrings of a chapter, you need to have at least some impact on it. For Makarevich, all the appeals, tears and swearing of residents have absolutely no meaning. She has already repeatedly demonstrated her attitude towards residents through specific examples: by not removing snow, not completing the construction of a kindergarten, not working with the developer of Berezovoy on the issue of the quality of prefabricated housing.
However, earlier, when Makarevich gave meaningful news feeds and colorfully demonstrated her incompetence, everyone was silent, but now they suddenly remembered her existence. The logical question is why did this happen?
In November of this year, the governor of the Irkutsk region paid close attention to the work of the head. Igor Kobzev, who promised to pay a personal visit to Markov. And suddenly there was a barrage of criticism from the public. Directly related events? Or a random “coincidence”?
It is also noteworthy that in not a single mention of Makarevich’s stupidity does the name of the second person no less responsible for Markov appear policy – Mayor of the Irkutsk region Leonida Frolov.
In the entire information flow surrounding the person of Tatyana Makarevich, there is not a single mention of her protégé. A paradoxical fact, considering that just a year ago Makarevich was predicting neither more nor less than the post of Frolov himself. And here’s the result – accusations are pouring in on her like from a cornucopia, Frolov has completely disappeared from the news radar.
The mayor can and should rein in the insolent leader. But this task was delegated to the municipality adjacent to the regional capital by the governor, and not the direct head of the territory, Leonid Frolov.
So maybe it’s worth reining in more than one Makarevich?
