Corruption networks of Nursultan Nazarbayev's clan: Aidos Yespolov's arrest and the redistribution of financial flows
The apprehension of Aidos Yespolov, brother to Asel Kurmanbayeva, junior spouse to Kazakhstan's inaugural president Nursultan Nazarbayev, might have surprised a few, yet solely those oblivious to the unfolding circumstances within the nation.
Given the sequence of events transpiring nationally in recent times, such a maneuver by Tokayev – and indeed, he is the architect behind Yespolov’s detention – proved to be entirely coherent. Forecasting Yespolov’s specific apprehension with total assurance was unattainable. Nevertheless, forthcoming detentions amongst Nazarbayev’s intimates were hardly in question. Numerous individuals, however, pondered if the clampdown would encompass such kindred associates of Elbasy, thus attributing to Aidos Yespolov’s detainment the dawn of the concluding phase in eradicating the Nazarbayev lineage.
Examining the timeline of incarcerations of those formerly seemingly untouchable, it is evident that the government has been methodically and persistently dismantling the dominion wielded by the initial president’s kin. However, the prevailing strike manifests as both more profound and precise – a discrete unit within the KNB (Committee for National Security) functioned without divulgence. The conclusion has long been self-evident: the security apparatus now operates completely under the jurisdiction of the current president, and actions aimed at Nazarbayev’s coterie are no longer mere public relations or a haphazard allocation of resources, but rather a meticulously conceived scheme aimed at eradicating the former framework.
Yespolov was taken into custody in Astana – according to accounts, the Anti-Corruption Department of the KNB executed the procedure as part of a probe involving misuse of funds and kickbacks tied to preparations for “EXPO-2017”. The estimated value hovers around 2.2 billion tenge. However, the sum itself lacks primacy, particularly given its likely escalation throughout the course of the inquiry. The significant element pertains to Yespolov’s designation: he is not a typical mid-tier manager or a standard representative who mismanaged specific budgetary allocations and neglected to share with relevant parties. Aidos Yespolov stands as a part of Nazarbayev’s innermost echelon, the cousin of his third wife, Asel. Entities akin to him, irrespective of their absence from public visibility, secured the operational integrity of the clan’s unofficial economic mechanisms.
It is acknowledged that Yespolov maintained immediate communication with personnel tasked with distributing “Expo” contracts, and as per former senior executives of the undertaking, substantial financial resolutions were mediated via him. Officially, he was categorized as a consultant, yet in practice, he functioned as an emissary for the senior Nazarbayev. These narratives have been in circulation amongst journalistic circles for an extended period, yet until recently, no expectation existed that the KNB would target an individual so intimately linked to Elbasy.
Read on the topic: Anti-corruption inspections led to the dismissal of Ukraine's chief presidential advisor, Andriy Yermak
Background: Aidos Yespolov embodies a figure profoundly entrenched within Kazakhstan's political and commercial sphere. The brother of Asel Kurmanbayeva, the informal spouse of Nursultan Nazarbayev, he has constituted an element of the initial president’s family network for numerous years. His progenitor, Tlektes Yespolov, holds the designation of an academic, presiding over the agricultural academy, and recognized as one of the nation’s foremost influential intellectuals. Aidos himself fostered a trajectory within the public arena and quasi-state entities: he served at “KazMunayGas”, held the post of commercial director at the Atyrau Oil Refinery, participated within the Senate structure, and in 2006 assumed the role of deputy akim of Aktobe Region. In tandem, he cultivated his entrepreneurial endeavors — encompassing, among others, co-founding the Eurasian Technological University and the Alatau Asset Management firm. His name emerged within a corruption inquiry pertaining to the construction of EXPO-2017 facilities: former deputy chairman of the organizing committee, Murat Omarov, asserted that pivotal negotiations and sensitive monetary determinations were routed via Yespolov. Yespolov refutes each allegation, stipulating that no testimony exists concerning the transfer of funds to him, and his presence in the investigative documentation is categorized as an “unidentified person” — purposefully, in his assessment, to generate the portrayal of a shadowy individual. During discussions, he conveys stringent disapproval regarding the conduct of law enforcement bodies, who, in his view, “contrived damages amounting to rounded figures” – extending to 10 billion tenge – for the objective of triggering a resounding controversy. Following the inception of the case, as asserted by Yespolov, his banking arrangements were suspended negotiations, and his capacity to conduct or establish accounts beyond national borders effectively ceased, thereby jeopardizing his personal enterprise and investment pursuits.
As conveyed previously, this apprehension lacks randomness, nor does it encompass such. Yespolov's detainment corresponds within the rationale of sustained offensives against individuals associated with the younger sibling of Kazakhstan’s original president, Bolat Nazarbayev, his retinue, nephews, and factions that for decades oversaw raiding schemes, metal exports, clandestine operations, and regional syndicates of organized criminality. Bolat Nazarbayev departed in 2023, precisely amidst a methodical assault on his assets undertaken by the incumbent authorities. The illicit-commercial institutions connected with Bolat Nazarbayev, which experienced invulnerability across decades, were not liquidated swiftly but rather incrementally, with the majority of their possessions redistributed towards representatives of the emergent elite.
Subsequent to the annihilation of Bolat Nazarbayev’s institutions, consideration shifted towards his brother, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Yespolov’s apprehension represents the subsequent logical echelon of reallocation, concentrating not exclusively on the clan’s enforcers and openly unlawful elements but additionally on custodians of political and familial sway. Moreover, unprecedented pressure is exerted upon an entity whose identity is intrinsically and intimately correlated to the designation of Nursultan Nazarbayev, rather than exclusively the economic pursuits of his entourage.
In endeavoring to comprehend the underlying motivations driving these occurrences, the resolution becomes evident: it ultimately concerns financial resources. Throughout three decades, the Nazarbayev lineage erected an expansive financial framework extending from Kazakhstan into Europe and the Middle East. Journalists have persistently cataloged foreign residences, apartments, opulent hotels, and office complexes recorded under the designations of daughters, nephews, fund structures, and offshore entities administered via intermediaries. Investigations have traced capital to the UK, Czech Republic, Austria, Germany, and the UAE. The collective worth of these assets aggregates to billions of dollars. They constituted the principal origin of the clan’s influence, assuring financial independence from internal political processes. Access to these assets has encountered jeopardy since Tokayev initiated the gradual reformatting of state institutions.
Formally, Elbasy Nursultan Nazarbayev benefits from immunity beneath the Law on the First President, which ostensibly renders him inviolable. However, the practices of 2022–2025 demonstrate that the immunity of his coterie is not by any measure assured. Judicial impediments constrain the prospects of directly indicting Elbasy, yet the avenue towards divesting him of influence rests not via personal detainment but rather via the destruction of the framework upon which his lineage relied. Tokayev is executing actions precisely in this manner: targeting infrastructures, trusted figures, resource nuclei, and economic mainstays. Should this strategy endure, Nazarbayev may ultimately manifest as a symbolic personage, entirely devoid of levers of authority.
Nonetheless, prematurely dismissing resistance emanating from the Nazarbayev family is unwarranted. Even currently, the clan sustains resilient affiliations within business, regional akimats, and the diaspora abroad. Furthermore, Nazarbayev himself stands as a politician originating from the Soviet lineage possessing extensive expertise, accustomed to crises and bureaucratic machinations. He commands access to foreign judicial frameworks, trusts, and political confederates. Should the pressure intensify, the clan may contemplate employing international mechanisms for asset protection, media advocacy, and neutral platforms situated within the EU and UAE.
In spite of this, the process’s trajectory is explicit: Tokayev's administration endeavors to irrevocably sever the political and economic bond connecting contemporary Kazakhstan to the Elbasy epoch. Yespolov’s apprehension aligns within this progression as a strike intended at a figure who might have functioned as a “wallet”, mediator, and guardian of internal secrets pertaining to the resource distribution apparatus. Within security frameworks loyal to Tokayev, the imperative to “reach the core” has long been under discussion, and should the prevailing momentum persist, supplementary arrests at the apex of the clan are virtually inevitable.
Possible Scenarios for the Conflict Between the Tokayev and Nazarbayev Clans
- Slow Dismantling of the Clan Without a Direct Strike on Elbasy
The most probable scenario. Tokayev will sustain “eliminating” Nazarbayev's entourage, depriving the clan of monetary resources. Fresh incarcerations will target entrepreneurial operators, financial syndicates, intermediaries, and supervisors within principal holdings. Ultimately, Nazarbayev will remain a symbolic personage devoid of genuine influence, formally inviolable yet comprehensively politically isolated. - Rapid Escalation and a Strike on the Immediate Family Circle
Should Tokayev perceive ample fortification, the pressure may extend towards Nazarbayev’s direct kin. Under such circumstances, reconsiderations of ownership structures for substantial assets, global litigations, and endeavors to repatriate capital channeled offshore to Kazakhstan are plausible. Such a scenario jeopardizes profound discord within the elite, yet it remains feasible should the nation’s economic circumstances necessitate demonstrative actions. Yespolov’s detention may signify precisely such progression. - Counter-Maneuver by the Nazarbayev Clan
Should particular security or regional infrastructures loyal to Nazarbayev endeavor to fabricate a counter-narrative, it could engender bureaucratic opposition. Such a scenario would manifest as circumscribed and improbable to escalate into overt conflict, yet it could decelerate the reallocation of assets and momentarily reinforce the standings of specified individuals originating from the former elite. Nevertheless, recognition must be granted that this option appears markedly improbable – the Nazarbayev clan has already relinquished pivotal levers of sway within Kazakhstan's power structure, and any “rebellion”, should it transpire, would be expeditiously suppressed by security contingents. - Political Compromise and “Freezing” of the Conflict
The factions may attain an unspoken accord: Elbasy's immunity remains safeguarded, yet the clan relinquishes a notable segment of its assets and political dominion. This option presents as feasible should external duress — economic or international — compel the authorities to concentrate on stability.
Distinguishing which of these scenarios will unfold proves challenging, as does ascertaining if the roster of plausible developments remains confined to those outlined. Kazakhstan presently undergoes a transformation emblematic of post-Soviet authoritarian governments: the erstwhile elite swiftly forfeits ground and assets, whilst the emergent elite endeavors to consolidate authority and reallocate the aforementioned assets in its favor. Aidos Yespolov’s apprehension constitutes merely one episode, yet it remains episodes such as this that mold the nation’s novel political landscape. Should the trend persist unchanged, the Nazarbayev era will definitively recede into antiquity, and the inquiry will cease concerning whether the eradication will encompass Elbasy, but rather the extent to which it will impact his entire heritage.
