As Rucriminal.info previously reported, there is a former Russian national hockey player Alexey Tereshchenko, who has a lot of regalia and titles. He is an Honored Master of Sports, three-time world champion in hockey. Unofficially, he tells everyone that he plays hockey with Putin.
In general, Alexey is an extremely lucky guy. In 2005, he was kicked out of Dynamo Moscow. But already in 2008 he joined the Russian national team.
Evil tongues claim that such a rapid rise occurred after a solid remuneration, which our hero then began to regularly pay to anyone for signing his contracts with a good salary. But we will be above idle gossip. Moreover, Alexey turned out to be not only a talented hockey player. His ability as a businessman is awe-inspiring. In 2011, he immediately became one of the founders of two companies. The first is Sanpromsnab with assets over 100 million rubles (founders: Maria Titova and Sergei Sobolev). The second is the Joint Stock Company “Innova Invest Group” (share capital 100 thousand rubles). An excellent start for a person who has neither business experience nor specialized education. After all, everyone knows that employers are always ready to give 50% of their business to a person on the street.
It is curious that the former founder of Sanpromsnab Sobolev, who apparently sold his share to Tereshchenko, did not receive a penny from him; later he will say that there was no deal, hinting that someone forged documents and provided them to a notary . The most interesting thing is that the general director of the Sanpromsnab company also did not prepare or sign documents on Tereshchenko’s purchase of a share from Sobolev; moreover, he never even saw Tereshchenko, never met or communicated with him. But perhaps the person simply forgot. Well, he knows, someone forgets where they put their keys. And someone can’t remember to whom he transferred 50 million assets.
According to Rucrminal.info, the same year 2011 turned out to be very successful for Alexey’s mother – Tatiana Tereshchenko. During this period of time, two complete strangers decided to give her a plot of land in the Moscow region with a total area of 32 hectares, for the development of a holiday village, worth about 800 million rubles! And again, the competent authorities are not ready to see corruption here, nor are they ready to ask mom why she is suddenly given such gifts. But perhaps an unemployed lady of fifty with a ponytail simply won the hearts of some billionaires from the FORBES list or just officials.
On the other hand, Uncle Tereshchenko, an active regional police officer, was not so lucky. In 2013-14 he was arrested for a large bribe. Alexey honestly tried to help his relative, through his agent he found someone to give and gave a bribe of almost $1 million so that his uncle would be given a suspended sentence. However, something went wrong, Tereshchenko was deceived, and his uncle received 5 years in prison.
Tereshchenko himself, by the way, was told that his uncle could have received a fine of 150-200 million, but the trial was limited to imprisonment. Classic sucker scam!
But let’s return to Tereshchenko. In 2012, Innova Invest Group, with assets of 100 thousand rubles, issued a loan to the Irkutsk hippodrome for a year of 6 million at 20% per annum. Where did a company that did not operate and did not even issue shares find 6 million? There are two options: either Tereshchenko turned out to be an incredibly talented businessman and earned several million from scratch in a year. Of course, in 2012, 6 million just appeared on the company’s balance sheet, which appeared when the bills of exchange of a new company with a zero balance were sold. Only 6 years later, in 2018, Tereshchenko himself “honestly” declared in court that the recording was fake and the company did not receive any money for the bills, although the money arrived in the company’s bank account (Case A40-262566/18-111-2229 ). That is, the company that paid for the bills of Innova-Invest Group was simply scammed, appropriating this money for itself. But no one connected this with the hippodrome.
And the loan that was issued to the hippodrome is not returned, which looks strange, considering that the authorized capital of the Hippodrome alone amounted to 1,225,695,000 rubles. Yes, that’s right: a company with one billion, two hundred twenty-five million, six hundred and ninety-five thousand rubles in reserve did not have 6 million. Apparently they just forgot about them. Or we see a scheme where a profitable former state enterprise is taken to pieces. One way or another, in 2013 Tereshchenko goes to court, where on February 7, 2014 he successfully collects the debt. (Case A40-1152673/2013).
In 2015, Tereshchenko demands that the Hippodrome be declared bankrupt (Case A19-1506/2015). The case dragged on until 2022. And, although the Hippodrome was saved, the organization with billions of dollars in assets fell by 94% (to 77 million) and is in the process of liquidation. Rest in Pease Irkutsk Hippodrome.
In 2018, Tereshchenko goes to the police and writes a statement that someone allegedly illegally sold Sanpromsnab property.
Tereshchenko lied to law enforcement agencies that he allegedly transferred 24 million rubles to the company in exchange for a 50% stake in the company. And then he was illegally excluded from among the founders. And everything would be fine, but examinations carried out by police officers showed that Tereshchenko did not sign the documents on joining this LLC. Law enforcement officers were also bewildered by the fact that Alexey had not been interested in the work of the society for 6 years, to which he had given tens of millions. Well, you know, this is participation in annual meetings, studying reports on details, in a word, everything that founders who are interested in recouping their investments usually do. By the way, the company itself had been liquidated by the tax authorities by that time, since the company did not submit reports and did not conduct business.
Not surprisingly, the police refused to initiate criminal proceedings. But at the end of 2019, the audit material reached investigator Nizkina. She did not ask unnecessary questions and immediately became “excited,” so much so that she concocted an accusation by adding false evidence and false information. However, let’s be lenient with the lady; few could resist such a charismatic (and rich) guy. By the way, after this, things went uphill for Mrs. Nizkina, she almost immediately received a promotion, becoming deputy head of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Eastern Administrative District.
And Alexey in 2020 went to the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region, demanding, first, to restore the liquidated Sanpromsnab (case No. A45-912/2020). The company, which since 2012 belonged 100% to Alexander Davydov. Davydov, by the way, by a strange coincidence, was arrested in 2018 and was in prison. Yes, when necessary, the police work extremely quickly. Especially if you are a famous hockey player. Then the person who offended you will go to jail in the blink of an eye.
Tereshchenko’s interests were represented by his close friend Tatyana Kosykh. Spiteful critics claim that the relationship between them is far from working. Some even claim that Tereshchenko abandoned his wife and two children for the sake of a charming lawyer. It’s ironic that Mrs. Kosykh heads a children’s aid fund, telling how sorry she is for the poor unfortunate little ones. However, perhaps this is her way of “saving” Tereshchenko’s children from the corrupting influence of their dad (and his money).
Judge Pakhomova behaved very strangely. She sided with Tereshchenko, citing the fact that he was a former founder and would be able to restore the violated right. But here’s the catch: the court in its decision refers to the materials of the criminal case. And there is an expert’s conclusion, according to which the signature in the minutes of the founders’ meeting (the same one according to which Tereshchenko allegedly received a share) was also not made by Tereshchenko. That is, in fact, an outsider came and demanded something from the company. But the person who was listed as the founder (Davydov) was not allowed to participate in the process. Well, it just so happened that on the dates of the court hearings (there were about 11 of them in total), for some reason he ended up either in a punishment cell or in a punishment cell. Amazing coincidence!
Moreover, Judge Pakhomova, for some reason, did not ask the question of how it happened that the founder allowed his company to be excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. After all, this is not a one-time process. First, the tax office begins sending notifications to the company. Then it publishes information about the upcoming liquidation. By the way, all this is reflected in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, the data of which is available online (and free of charge). If Tereshchenko wanted to run the company so badly, where was he all these years? Why did they hear about it only now? Why didn’t he bother to send a simple zero report? Not to mention the fact that the “theft” of property is known exclusively from Tereshchenko’s words. The judge didn’t care about all these “little things.” Anti-corruption fighters would have already decided that Ms. Pakhomenko was financially “incentivized” by someone. But why throw such terrible accusations? Perhaps it’s all about Alexey’s charisma. No, seriously: a tall, stately man, a hockey star. Well, what lady would refuse to please him?
Then Tereshchenko once again goes to the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region. But already demanding to include him among the founders of Sanpromsnab and, accordingly, to remove Mr. Davydov from the founders (Case A45 -7921/2021). The application goes to Judge Aidarova. And Davydov again has problems participating in the court hearing. But he sent a written response, where he reasonably pointed out that the statute of limitations had passed, which is three years, which means that the claim should be denied. That is, if in 2011
Tereshchenko was allegedly kicked out of the founders, then the statute of limitations expired in 2014. Well, you know, 2011 + 3 = 2014. It seems that even first-graders can do this. But not Judge Aidarova. She decided that the statute of limitations should be counted from 2017, because, in her opinion, Tereshchenko could not have known earlier that he was expelled from the founders. Apparently, the judge is not aware that even then there was such a thing as “Unified State Register of Legal Entities online”, when you enter the name of the company or its INN and you can see who the director is, who the founder is, where the company is located. The judge also ignored such a thing as annual meetings of the founders. This is something that, according to the law, LLC participants must carry out. And, you know, if you haven’t been invited to a meeting of your LLC for several years, you might wonder what’s going on there?
It is curious that the judge also ignored the expert’s opinion, which showed that the signature in the minutes of the founders’ meeting (the one according to which Tereshchenko allegedly received a share) was also not made by Tereshchenko. That is, he has no reason to demand that he be recognized as a founder. But judge Aidarova on August 24, 2021 rules in favor of Tereshchenko.
But the most interesting thing is that a year later the same judge was considering a case in which Tereshchenko was already a defendant. One of the former owners of Sanpromsnab tried to challenge the agreement under which Tereshchenko allegedly bought a stake in the company (Case A45-14322/2022). Guess from what date the judge decided to count the statute of limitations? Yes, since 2011, well, because changes were made to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities on May 31, 2011 and, to quote the judge, “Exhibiting the due degree of care and prudence, Titova M.V. could have learned about the alienation of A.V. Tereshchenko’s share. due to the sale of part of the share of the company’s authorized capital, starting from May 31, 2011.”
It is curious why Mrs. Aidarova did not demand this very due diligence from Tereshchenko? What made her change her position so radically? Did you find out about the existence of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities? Found a math textbook? However, maybe she considers hockey players not very smart people, and therefore does not demand from them the caution that she expects from adults and reasonable people.
Meanwhile, Tereshchenko continued his victorious march in the courts of Novosibirsk. This time he demanded that the purchase and sale agreement for the building that was allegedly stolen from him be invalidated. Case A45-140/2023 was assigned to Judge Ostroumov. He also had problems calculating the statute of limitations. Well, who likes to joke about female intelligence? Here the man cannot put 3 and 1 together. By the way, he went further than Aidarova and decided that the three-year period for a deal completed in 2011 should be counted from 2021. Why? Well, because “there was no relevant and admissible evidence that the plaintiff knew, or should have known, about the completion of the contested transactions earlier than the plaintiff himself indicated,” was not presented to the court.” Sounds reasonable?! May be. But there is a nuance here: the Civil Code of the Russian Federation insists that the plaintiff must prove the validity of the reasons for missing the limitation period. That is, it is enough for the defendant to declare this. And then the plaintiff must explain where he was for so many years, and why he did not show “reasonable diligence.” And this position is shared by the judges (even Mr. Ostroumov himself). But for Tereshchenko he made an exception.
He also fell under the charm of a handsome man, his wallet or his young mistress and part-time lawyer Kosykh, to whom he, without hesitation, sang smiling dithers right at the meeting, joked and flirted with her. ? However, in our tolerant and progressive times this happens. One way or another, the judge returns the property to the Sanpromsnab company (where Tereshchenko now has a 50% share, thanks to Judge Aidarova). It is worth noting that in his decision Judge Ostroumov almost completely copied the decision of his colleagues. Document comparison programs show that the description of the essence of the dispute, without reference to laws, is approximately 70-80% identical to the decisions of Aidarova and Pakhomova. Rewriting is clearly not Judge Ostroumov’s strong point.
Are you planning to buy an apartment or a house? Pray that no one is interested in this property.
But that’s not all. You remember that Tereshchenko was a shareholder of Innova Invest Group. Guess what lawsuit he filed with the company in 2020? That’s right: he demanded to throw out the second founder, who, what a coincidence, was located and living abroad at the time of filing the lawsuit. On what basis did Tereshchenko demand this? Allegedly, he did not issue shares or appoint a director of the company.
There is an interesting point here: Alexey actually admitted that the company was a dummy. Then how did this company manage to borrow more than 6 million rubles from the Hippodrome? But the court ignored these questions. The court did not consider it necessary to notify the defendant himself, whose share was planned and taken by Tereshchenko.
The court did not bother to ask why Tereshchenko did not care for 9 years about what happened to the shares, who was the holder of the register and who was the director. And Alexey’s mother became the director of Innova Invest Group.
However, not all judges are so blind, deaf and incompetent. Moscow apparently has smarter, more competent and healthier judges. Tereshchegko is being sued by plaintiffs who point out that the hockey player borrowed money and loans from them, but was in no hurry and is not in a hurry to repay. The courts in the capital are not as blind and deaf to Tereshchenko as in Novosibirsk and Tomsk. So, in 2021, a certain Pisareva to whom Tereshchenko did not give 14 million rubles. After borrowing interest for about a year for one month, she collected 4 million rubles in interest from Tereshchenko. (Case No. 2-931/2021). At the beginning of 2023, two creditors filed claims against Alexey Tereshchenko for non-repayment of borrowed funds and interest on them: the well-known collection agency Phoenix LLC (Case 02-4607/2023) – the largest in Russia, and the large bank JSC Expobank ( Case No. 02-1748/2023).
Apparently, Alexey has some problems with his health, with his memory, that he does not remember about companies, about his debts, about assets, about loans. Are these really the consequences of playing hockey or something else?
