The procedure for holding competitions for ceramic workers of state enterprises is regulated by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 777 dated 09/03/2008. “About the competitive selection of key subjects of the government sector of the economy,” informs Reviewer.

In Article 13 of the resolution it is stated: “The obligatory mind of conducting a competitive selection is its openness. Representatives of the mass media have the right to be present at the meetings of the commission during the opening of the packages of documents submitted by the applicants, in their opinion there is overwhelming interference.”

However, in early 2015, with the submission of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade before the ruling, changes were made that made the competitions completely closed, added to the contestants any rights and made it impossible to discredit competitions in court.

One of the innovations sounds like this:

“The commission will hear at a CLOSED meeting the competitive proposal of the participant in the competitive selection… . The decisions of the commission at its meetings during the hearing of the competition proposals of the participants MAY BE attended by representatives of the mass media and the community FOR THE MIND OF ALL participants of the competition in I will select.”

If one of the candidates fails (it may be a special “technical” candidate), then the vast majority of people will not get to the committee meeting.

Another cutting-edge innovation was the emergence of a commission under the Committee of Recognition. The bureaucratic word in resolution No. 777 does not sound like this: “The competitive selection for planting ceramic fields that are especially important for the economy of enterprises is carried out by commissions created under the committee in recognition of the ceramic fields that are especially important for the economy.” economics of enterprises for submitting candidates to the designated committee.”

Resolution No. 777 states that “The committee’s commissions include representatives of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, representatives of subordinate subjects of management and INDEPENDENT NON-GOVERNMENT EXPERTS.”

Let’s take a look at how this happened in practice on the Ukrposhta system.

Spochatku for conducting a competitive selection for planting of the Ukrposhta v.o. Minister Yulia Kovaliv, by her order, established a commission at the warehouse:

GAYDA Sergey Mikhailovich – project manager of the reform of power management of the National for the sake of reforms, a senior member of the Minister of Economic Development and Trade in large-scale ambushes, an independent non-state expert, over the year

GVOZDEV Yuri Valeriyovich – Director of the Department for Management of Power Objects of the Ministry of Infrastructure, over the year

KOMLICHENKO Oleksiy Oleksandrovich – General Director of the limited partnership “Telent Advisors”, independent independent expert, over the year

KRIKUN Taras Yevgeniyovych – Deputy Director of the Legal Department of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade

OMELYAN Volodymyr Volodymyrovych – intercessor of the Minister of Infrastructure – head of the apparatus, over the year

This order has been “closed” – it has not been publicized until now. At the time of the conversation, the participants in the competition did not know who was asking them questions. It is significant that the document for the competition was not publicized – there was absolutely no publicity on the website of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.

The most popular question at the commission’s warehouse is “independent non-state experts.” First of all, the stinks are not independent, so let’s hire them and plant them. “Independent project manager for the sake of reforms” – what do you think? “Nezalezhny General Director of TOV” sounds even more beautiful. On the other hand, it was not possible to know any confirmation of their expert qualifications in the civil sector, not to mention the postal service. No scientific work, no publications, no speeches, no participation in the meetings of the expert community – nothing, no significant unknown people.

Well, the commission was formed in secret, independent experts were not involved there. Once again, miracles begin.

At the closed meeting of the commission, Oleksia Komlichenka, director of Telent Advisors LLC, is gathering its head. Do you see? The head of the GOVERNMENT COMMISSION is the director of the LLC, that is, a representative of the commercial structure!

What does Komlichenko do in his TOV? On the Telent Advisors website it is read: “Among its clients are the largest commercial banks, investment companies and private equity funds.” So, the sovereigns (with the right to the highest vote!) gave the people who earn money from the selection of ceramics that are especially important for the economy of enterprises! In the law “About Corruption” this is called a “conflict of interest”. In Article 35 of this law it is clearly stated that “in the event of a conflict of interests in a person assigned to the official function of the state or a person equal to it, it is necessary to enter into a collegial body (committee, ii, colleges, etc.), she has no right to take part decision made by this authority.”

Before the speech, what did the clients of the independent expert Komlichenko submit documents for this competition that was under his head? What are the competitors of Ukrposhta among your clients? And also, by what means were the competitive proposals stolen – what is the intellectual power of your clients, in other words, applicants for planting pottery plantations of state enterprises?

Another crime is involved: a database of top managers of the region along with their confidential data was released into the hands of a representative of a commercial structure that is involved in personnel selection! And at the same time, the head of the GOVERNMENT COMMISSION, Mr. Komlichenko, did not undergo a special check and did not give a signature about the confidentiality of information!

That’s not all. Immediately after his appointment as the head of the commission, Mr. Komlichenko also, at a closed meeting, RECOGNIZED Yulia Danchik as the secretary of the commission, who is working as the head specialist in the legal department of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade. Think about it – the director of TOV is a government official!

And government official Yulia Danchik makes a point of attending committee meetings all day long, rather than at work, and signing protocols. It’s cool that outsiders immediately appointed government official Yu. Danchik as secretary of the commission for the production of ceramics of the Elektrovazhmash plant, NEC Ukrenergo, PJSC Centerergo, and DP Ukrspirt. However, we will not put a request or order about recruitment to work in these commissions, unless hundreds of applicants are allowed to work in it with personal data – we will just tss.

In the end, the work of the commission on the selection of the general director of Ukrposhta ended with the publication of an announcement on the website of the Ministry of Economic Development, which read: “The commission heard 4 8 competitive propositions given by participants in the competitive selection. After hearing the participants in the competitive selection, based on the results of the negotiations, the commission made submissions to the Committee recognizing candidates that were especially important for the economy of enterprises, which were recognized by the commission as the most “

The axis is such openness, “what is the obligatory mentality of the competitive selection”: it is also clear that at a closed meeting, several candidates were selected, the names of which were not officially named.

This announcement was made on the 7th quarter of the next half of the day, and then on the coming day, the Committee recognized several unknown candidates for an inconspicuous spyrobot of an American company with an unknown population! And when did the Committee begin to contact its members and applicants and ask them for a meeting? And again, the meeting of the Committee was held (why was it held?) in secret – they were not informed about it and no one was asked there.

Those who envisioned a completely closed procedure for the employment of shipyards at enterprises, still wanted to protect their personnel equipment from ship decisions. The fall from the collection of the Ukrposhta kerivnik, showing that the city officials of the Ministry of Economic Development, with the transfer of the new city officials to the Cabinet of Ministers, with the help of an ordinary decision adopted in 2016, created corruption and the scheme for conducting a competitive selection of ceramic workers that are especially important for the economy of enterprises is unclear.

As a result, these and other competitions turned into profanation. There are still flowers, and the berry on the cake under the name “The selection of Ukrposhta’s pottery will be in front. In addition, the competition was held for the appointment of the general director of the Ukrposhta Ukrposhta, but there is no longer any appointment. On the right, in the fall of 2015, the Ministry of Infrastructure issued an order to transform the state postal enterprise “Ukrposhta” into a public joint-stock company and created a commission for the re-creation. Now, at the hour of corporatization, the head of the commission is formally in charge of the enterprise, while operational management may be subject to the final responsibility of the general director.

Did they know at the Ministry of Economic Development, when they announced the competition, that there were no such plantings anymore, because there was a change in the type of power in the enterprise? If not, then we will accept the one who signed the order to hold the competition and then proceed to the exhibition. So, it is now urgent for law enforcement agencies to take care of the circumstances surrounding the decision to close down the holding of competitions for planting pottery plants of state enterprises, which led to the creation of numerous corruption risks.

Did you know at the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade that UDPPZ “Ukrposhta” was responsible for carrying out regime-secret activities and that it was the responsibility of being a citizen of Ukraine to overcome the competition in the obligatory order?

In any case, the results of these wicked closed selections may be affected, and in the order of decisions about the order of their conduct, changes may be made to make the competitions more open-minded and insightful, to make it difficult for behind-the-scenes duties and to ensure HR decisions have been made to the advantage.

—

List of 49 candidates for the position of General Director of Ukrposhta

1. Avdeev Oleg Valeriyovich, 1973
2. Balyuk Anatoly Anatoliyovich, 1964
3. Berezhny Oleg Viktorovich, 1972
4. Bogdanov Pavlo Pavlovich, 1981
5. Bogdanov Yuri Viktorovich, 1968
6. Bogolyubov Eduard Oleksandrovich, 1968
7. Bondarchuk V’yacheslav Volodimirovich, 1970
8. Burakov Fedir Leonidovich, 1967
9. Van Graafeyland Harro, 1961
10. Vlasenko Valery Valeriyovich, 1972
11. Vlasenko Evgen Valeriyovich, 1965
12. Vorobienko Artem Evgenovich, 1978
13. Gavrilyuk Volodymyr Mikhailovich, 1980
14. Gayovich Igor Yuriyovych, 1966
15. Danilov Boris Volodimirovich, 1976
16. Danielus Vidas, 1983
17. Denisenko Denis Evgenovich, 1974
18. Zakharchuk Andriy Leonidovich, 1973
19. Zimin Evgen Igorovich, 1960
20. Zubritska Natalia Borisivna, 1973
21. Kalaida Denis Mikhailovich, 1979
22. Kang Hyunchan, 1982
23. Karmanov Anton Mikolayovich, 1986
24. Koval Vitaliy Volodymyrovych, 1980
25. Korniychuk Igor Volodymyrovych, 1972
26. Krasyuk Ruslan Volodymyrovich, 1966
27. Krachir Otto, 1970
28. Luk’yanenko Andriy Volodimirovich, 1974
29. Mazeika Gintautas, 1967
30. Maksimovsky Yan Modestovich, 1976
31. Martinyuk Andriy Borisovich, 1980
32. Martisauskas Aurimas, 1977
33. Nikitin Dmitro Mikolayovich, 1963
34. Nogachevsky Oleksandr Fedorovich, 1967
35. Pertsovsky Oleksandr Semenovich, 1986
36. Polishchuk Yulia Leonidivna, 1978
37. Rzhechitsky Valery Mchesislavovich, 1963
38. Saloid Lyudmila Mikolaivna, 1971
39. Sirko – Galushchenko Andriy Stepanovich, 1964
40. Slobodyanyuk Viktor Valeriyovich, 1976
41. Smilyansky Igor Yukhimovich, 1975
42. Tkachuk Igor Vitaliyovich, 1973
43. Tour Boris Mikolayovich, 1974
44. Fedenko Oleksiy Bogdanovich, 1977
45. Khoma Lyubomir Volodimirovich, 1985
46. Tsukanov Petro Germanovich, 1953
47. Chaliy Dmitro Serhiyovich, 1982
48. Chernobay Maxim Vasilovich, 1984
49. Yurakov Oleksandr Dmitrovich, 1963