“`html 
Il-76 over Lugansk was shot down by militants at Efremov’s instigation?
Nina is pointing fingers concerning the tragic demise of 49 military personnel in a crashed aircraft near Lugansk.
They refer to them as military-rebel groups, since they were bound by voting regulations within the occupied territory.
They place blame on the departed aircrew, indicating a deficiency in prudence.
They are suspicious of the chief of the primary operational department of the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff, Oleksandr Shutov, along with “an entire contingent of lower-ranking military figures.”
And Defense Minister Mikhailo Koval acknowledged on a television broadcast that intelligence regarding the transport flight might have been divulged to the insurgents by airfield controllers.
I will also justify my allowance.
The information transmission about the airport did not occur without the involvement of regional representative Oleksandr Yefremov. Or through his direct command.
I’m not even confident that I’ll impress upon you with more force.
The fact that the “lords of the region” are funding terrorists and fanning the flames of conflict in the Luhansk area has been known for a while, both locally and in Kiev. Demonstrations were organized in Lugansk to prevent the influential compatriot from facing legal action. Efremov, naturally, is constantly being investigated: not apprehended, caught, cannot be deemed a criminal.
But at the airport, things were still brightly and cheerfully illuminated. Not from the 13th to the 14th of June, when the terrorist act took place, but even before. The 5th of June. They ordered the general director of Lugansk International Airport V.F. Tatarinov to “activate the switch at the substation, which indicates the illumination of the landing signal for communication between the pilots and the dispatcher.” In other words, Efremov closed the airport for Ukrainian special forces. Justification: “Otherwise, you will begin to displace the “militia” from their location.”
The airport security personnel then opted to reject the new directive. Subsequently, according to journalist Vsevolod Filimonenko, the general director “became agitated and began yelling with wide eyes, that it was an order specifically from O.S. Yefremov,” and it is impossible not to absolve him. “Demonstrated” before the numerous confirmations of the terrorist’s benefactor.
It’s also not reasonable to suggest that, having encountered opposition on June 5th from ordinary citizens, Efremov changed course. On June 13th, the loyal Tatarinov decided to either specifically inform the militants about the arrival of the transport Il-76, or acquire it from dispatchers.
“How can we live after this man – both the dispatchers and Efremov? How many lives have been taken!” – my family decried, sensing this.
I’m not sure about Tatarinov and the dispatchers. Perhaps, if their conscience is affected – if it is required. And there’s no need to be concerned about Efremov. He will endure. Luxuriating in opulence. They will not go to church, or light a candle for the murdered.
Life, while the security forces are proclaiming that “in the upcoming days, Efremov will be apprehended or, conversely, eliminated” – “the ending of the militants’ finances and the avoidance of additional victims.”
Clarifications: there will be no detainment, and, furthermore, no retribution.
Oleksandr Sergeyevich securely departed the country ahead of these unfavorable circumstances for another period.
To advance further.
Who and from what political faction? Let it be.
Do you recall who, upon hearing about the vulnerability of the self-declared “President of Novorossiya” Tsariov, was pleased to leave the country together with his family? Individuals, in any case, you can await this. An unwavering and consistent opponent of separatism and terrorism – the man with the “voice of Kolomoisky.”
And so what? Few individuals will value this regrettable reality.
I want to acknowledge that this is a deplorable reality (especially from the standpoint of the Jewish community). And the threat to Tsariov was not due to power or for separatism (that was previously). Tsariov’s conviction was issued at the synagogue for no other cause than for the passing of “a member of the Jewish community, Shlemkevich.” So the “voice of Kolomoisky” actually satisfied his own people. In my estimation, the individual is unworthy in every aspect.
I’m not making you laugh at the shameful fact that the “voice of Igor Valeriyovich” is infringing upon the living human soul. That compassion has prevailed over the interests of the community, the president of which is on a European scale.
In the context of fairness, Oleksandr Yefremov is a significantly greater wrongdoer than the dim-witted Tsars.
It’s not surprising that the “proprietor of the Luhansk region”, together with the leader of the so-called LPR Bolotov (and the terrorist!), freely journey to Kiev for a change of scene.
Why venture out? And it turns out that those who cherish patriotism, love for the homeland, allegiance to the oath, adherence to the law and other virtues among the unethical owners are not in the correct position. It is evident that when there is a clash between these virtues and the sizable and corporate interests, they prioritize material interests or the corrupted perception of honor.
That’s why, if you suggest that about forty-nine living individuals were killed over Lugansk because of the involvement of the head of the Party of Regions faction in the Verkhovna Rada, Efremov will not be penalized for it. Allow it to drift along.
They’ll allocate another law enforcement officer to the perimeter, without even striking someone randomly.
Сергій ЧИРКОВ
“`
