Valeria Lutkovskaya. “Pocket” ombudsman

Valeria Lutkovskaya was appointed to the post of Commissioner for Human Rights in the Verkhovna Rada in the spring of 2012. She is the direct creation of ex-Minister of Justice Alexander Lavrynovych (his son, according to Skelet.Info, was Pavel Lazarenko’s chief lawyer and through him negotiations were conducted with Gennady Korban and Igor Kolomoisky), which was pulled through parliament by the “Family” authorities. The newly appointed ombudsman has shown herself to be professionally unfit and far from human rights.

Lutkovskaya represented Ukraine in the European Court in the cases “Lutsenko v. Ukraine” and “Tymoshenko v. Ukraine”, tried to illegally fire employees, conducted searches in their offices, filed a fake declaration and drove a stolen car.

Skelet.Info talks about how a teacher of Ukrainian language and literature made a successful legal career.

Valeria Lutkovskaya. From teacher to lawyer

Lutkovskaya Valeria Vladimirovna Lutkovskaya was born on January 20, 1972 in Kyiv. Nothing is known about her family and childhood. Only dry biographical facts are publicly available – she was born, she studied, she worked. However Skelet.Info I still found out information about the family of the future ombudsman.

Valeria Lutkovskaya’s mother, Elizaveta Mironovna Bobrovskaya, was a teacher of Russian language and literature at a specialized school with in-depth study of the German language No. 149 in Kiev.

My father is a former military man; after retirement, he taught basic military training at school. My mother’s grandmother was at one time a very good and fairly well-known lawyer in Kyiv. Elizaveta Mironovna named her daughter in honor of her deceased brother. After the death of the young man, she promised her mother, grandmother Lutkovskaya, that she would name her child Valery. But she had a girl, and the name was changed to a feminine version.

Little Valeria studied at her “mother’s” school – specialized school No. 149. At the age of 16, she again followed in her mother’s footsteps and entered the Kiev State University named after T. G. Shevchenko at the Faculty of Philology.

In 1990, Valeria Lutkovskaya got married. Her husband was the famous translator of the Gospel into modern Russian, Father Leonid Lutkovsky.

The man was 22 years older and taught seminars at the university during non-lecture time. Valeria Vladimirovna was then writing her course work and turned to the priest-teacher for help. A relationship developed between the student and the teacher. True, exclusively platonic, since the girl was underage. The day after Valeria Lutkovskaya’s 18th birthday, a man proposed to her. A year later their daughter Anastasia was born. 4 years later, Leonid Lutkovsky died, and Valeria Vladimirovna became a widow.

Having received her diploma in 1993, the newly-minted teacher returned home to school No. 149 to teach Russian language and literature. Valeria Vladimirovna took charge of the 5th grade and at the same time taught German to first-graders. This went on for a year. Lutkovskaya’s mother suggested she change her profession. She thought that two teachers in a family was too much, and advised me to go get another education – legal.

In 1994, Valeria Lutkovskaya entered the National Academy of Internal Affairs at the Faculty of Law. After studying for only a year, she got a job at the Ministry of Justice. Then the department allegedly required a person without a legal education, but with knowledge of the German language. Valeria Vladimirovna, who studied German from the first grade of school, received the position of operator-machinist, combining it with the duties of a courier. While working and studying in parallel, in 1999 Lutkovskaya graduated from the Academy with a diploma in law.

Great jurisprudence and family ties

In 2001, Valeria Lutkovskaya was appointed to the position of Commissioner for Compliance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights. She began representing Ukraine at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

In 2003, Valeria Vladimirovna was promoted – she was offered the position of Deputy Minister of Justice. The Ministry of Justice was then headed by Alexander Lavrinovich under Prime Minister Anatoly Kinakh. Few people knew that Lutkovskaya got into the department through connections: her sister is Lavrinovich’s wife. But the happiness was short-lived. In February 2005, Lavrynovych lost his portfolio after the appointment of the government of Yulia Tymoshenko and went to “sit out” the Orange government at the Ukrnafta company. The deputy minister was able to stay afloat and remained to wait for her boss. By the way, a few years later Lutkovskaya will take full revenge on Tymoshenko for the insult, but more on that a little later.

Valeria Vladimirovna became deputy to the newly appointed head of the Ministry of Justice Sergei Golovaty. Relations with the new boss did not work out; she lasted six months and was fired by order of President Viktor Yushchenko. However, Viktor Andreevich soon relented and confirmed Lutkovskaya’s powers as Commissioner for Compliance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Lutkovskaya did not remain unemployed: on December 12 she left the Ministry of Justice, on the 13th she was offered to become deputy director for judicial protection in the law firm Lavrinovich and Partners, which was headed by the eldest son of the ex-Minister of Justice Maxim Lavrinovich, and on the 14th – she went to work. Valeria Vladimirovna was provided with a “warm” place by her brother-in-law Lavrinovich Sr.

Alexander Lavrinovich with his son Maxim and his wife

Don’t leave your relative without a job. Moreover, the eldest son of the ex-minister was not distinguished by a brilliant legal or other mind, although he did a lot of PR and tried to please his dad, as a result of which he set his dad up even more – he turned to the wrong PR agencies (you can google PR people and agencies that served Lavrynovych and Partners – Conference House, etc.). And dad needed support and backup in great machinations. Actually, what did the company do? Such an area as the conflictual takeover of other people’s businesses. That is, raiding. In fact, the scheme of work looked very simple: the dealers found the most problematic client, developed a legal plan for him, entangled him with court decisions, and then took away the business. To implement this model, three components were needed: a law firm, support throughout the state legal vertical, and an experienced “inside” person.

Everything was available. Papa Lavrinovich is the shadow component of the company that makes real decisions; son Lavrinovich is a pleasant, stupid smiling face, Lutkovskaya’s “own” person is on the back-up. You can do anything with impunity.

(note the presence in the list of Alexander Onufrienko, a former partner of AMC KINTO and a teacher at the Kiev-Mohyla Academy. After Onufrienko’s departure, in fact, KINTO “self-destructed,” although before that it occupied a leading position in the market).

The dawn of success and the signing of lucrative deals by the company came at the end of 2006. Can it be considered a coincidence that in the fall of this year Alexander Lavrinovich again took up his post in the Ministry of Justice? Let’s leave this question unanswered. Without being tied to dates, during this period Lavrynovych and Partners Law Firm, according to Skelet.Infounder the leadership of Valeria Lutkovskaya, supported the licensing agreement between NK Alliance and Shell to create a joint venture to manage a network of gas stations in Ukraine. The price was $300 million.

After Lavrinovich headed the department, Valeria Vladimirovna also returned to her position as deputy. Less than a year later, relatives found themselves at the center of a scandal. In 2007, a trial involving multimillion-dollar kickbacks was held in Ukraine, similar to the theater of the absurd. In court they confronted each other – Lavrinovich the father and Lavrinovich the son, and Valeria Lutkovskaya controlled the process. Then a conflict broke out between OJSC Hotel Dnepr (successor to the State Enterprise Hotel Complex Dnepr), the Austrian LLC Alfa Project Holding, and the Cypriot company Packaging Investment LTD. It turned out that in 1994-2000 the hotel management entered into a number of agreements with Alfa Project Holding to carry out repair work to modernize the number of rooms. One can only imagine the size of the kickback, given that about $4 million was transferred to the accounts of the Austrian company. In 2006, the Kyiv prosecutor’s office filed a lawsuit to invalidate the investment agreement between Dnepr and the Austrian company. The court granted the claim. This forced Alfa Project Holding to apply to the International Center for Resolving Investment Disputes with a statement of claim against the State of Ukraine. In Ukraine, the offshore company chose a partner – Law Firm “Lavrynovych and Partners”. Then Lavrinovich Sr. entered the game. He initiated that the State of Ukraine would be represented in the dispute by the Ministry of Justice. Part of the control powers was transferred to Valeria Vladimirovna. However, the matter dragged on, and Alexander Lavrinovich was dismissed. The family did not have time to turn the business into their favor.

Despite the departure of her boss from the Ministry of Justice in 2007, Lutkovskaya retained her position. Moreover, she was assigned to be responsible for the international direction of work, as well as to supervise the Poltava and Zhytomyr regional departments of justice. She had to work in the department without a wing for 3 years – Lavrynovych Sr. returned to the chair only in 2010, when Viktor Yanukovych came to power.

In 2011, Valeria Vladimirovna received a new appointment – government commissioner for the European Court of Human Rights.

Lutkovskaya against

In the European Court, Valeria Vladimirovna’s client was the state of Ukraine. Even when Viktor Yanukovych was settling scores with undesirables, Lutkovskaya defended the state’s position in the cases “Lutsenko v. Ukraine” and “Tymoshenko v. Ukraine.” Let’s look at them in more detail.

“Tymoshenko against Ukraine”. The first to fall under the hot hand of Viktor Yanukovych was former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. In 2011, the Pechersky District Court of Kyiv sentenced her to 7 years in prison for abuse of power during the signing of gas contracts with Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) in 2009. Valeria Lutkovskaya realized that the time had come to get even for herself and her relative Lavrynovych, whom Tymoshenko kicked out of office in 2005.

Tymoshenko appealed to the European Court to appeal her detention for health reasons. However, thanks to Lutkovskaya, the court received documents according to which Yulia Vladimirovna refused medical examinations and assistance in Ukraine 18 times (!). The papers set out the full chronology of Tymoshenko’s examinations in the Kiev pre-trial detention center and the Kachanovskaya colony, and provided information about the doctors’ recommendations based on the examination results.

“Lutsenko against Ukraine”. Yuri Vitalievich Lutsenko (More details about him in the article by Yuriy Lutsenko. “Terminator” of Ukrainian politics), former Minister of Internal Affairs in two governments of Yulia Tymoshenko, was arrested in 2010 on strange charges. Allegedly, with his public activities, he interfered with the investigation of criminal cases brought against him and did not admit the charges brought against him. At the beginning of 2012, Lutsenko was sentenced to 4 years. The case was clearly ordered and selective in nature – Yanukovych removed oppositionists.

Yuri Vitalievich appealed to the European Court. He challenged unlawful arrest and detention. Ukraine, or rather the interests of Viktor Fedorovich and the Family (!!!), was represented in court by Valeria Lutkovskaya. She stated that the arrest of the ex-minister was caused by the desire of the Ukrainian court to avoid possible pressure on witnesses. Moreover, it was she who prepared and sent to the European Court of Human Rights a document entitled “Observations of the Government of Ukraine in the case of Lutsenko v. Ukraine.” The paper says in black and white that Yuri Vitalievich’s rights were not violated, and there were no signs of political pressure in the criminal cases brought against him.

Extract from the document “Observations of the Government of Ukraine in the case of Lutsenko v. Ukraine”

Lutkovskaya even visited Menskaya correctional colony No. 91, where Yuriy Lutsenko was serving his sentence. She examined the laundry, bathhouse and catering unit of the colony. And I couldn’t find anything to complain about.

Valeria Lutkovskaya in the Menskaya colony, where Yuriy Lutsenko was imprisoned

Having sent Lutsenko through the courts, pre-trial detention centers and prisons, Valeria Vladimirovna asked for pardon for the ex-minister. After all, her job title includes the words “rights” and “person.” Yanukovych signed the decree. They say that Yuri Vitalievich personally called Lutkovskaya and thanked her for the “salvation.”

An interesting fact: when Lutkovskaya spoke in the European Court, she was already applying for the post of Commissioner for Human Rights in the Verkhovna Rada.

Let us note that during the time that Valeria Vladimirovna was in the position of Commissioner for the Affairs of the European Court, Ukraine openly ignored the decisions of the Supreme Body and found itself in one of the last places in all discipline ratings. The country was even threatened with expulsion from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

Valeria Lutkovskaya. New “broom puppet”

On April 24, 2012, Valeria Lutkovskaya was elected Commissioner for Human Rights in the Verkhovna Rada. This happened on the second attempt – the first time, on March 15, 2012, there were not enough votes – 226 “for” were needed, but only 212 were received. The leaders of the Party of Regions (how it looks in modern post-Maidan realities!) carried out “educational work” and for the second time Valeria Vladimirovna was supported by 252 deputies.

Lutkovskaya was openly called the creature of Alexander Lavrinovich. Naturally, the current government placed its people in the right places. They needed a puppet to more effectively promote the “correct” bills for their illegal activities. For example, all bills proposed by the Ministry of Justice must undergo an examination to ensure compliance with human rights and receive an ombudsman visa. A “pocket” man, like no one else, could help in this. Moreover, the scheme already existed. Lavrinovich developed a law providing for the allocation of budget funds and took money from those interested in its implementation. Here the “family ombudsman” came into play, encouraging everything they said. The law passed through the Rada, and then Lavrynovych began to collect bribes for conducting legal opinions and approvals when adopting by-laws (without which the law simply would not work). Legal services, of course, were provided by Lavrinovich and Partners. According to Skelet.Info – the kickback, at least 25% of the amount of the economic program, went into the pocket of his beloved son Maxim. By the way, then Lavrinovich planned to “leak” the passport system to foreigners.

Valeria Vladimirovna herself hid whose protege she was and stated that her candidacy for the post was “suggested” by regional deputies (again – !!! – under the current post-Maidan government). In fact, Lavrinovich personally went and collected signatures from parliamentarians for his protégé. The deputies were not aware of what exactly they were signing. The cunning ex-Minister of Justice fooled many people by talking about some new “bill” designed to protect the rights of large families. The NSDC Secretary, who specially arrived in the Rada, ensured correct voting Andrey Klyuevappointed the day before as the head of the election headquarters of the Party of Regions.

The voting procedure itself was insanity: before throwing their ballot into the ballot box, regional deputies showed it to Mikhail Chechetov. Chechetov himself allegedly explained that voting in their party is not secret, and this is … the highest manifestation of democracy. The ballot itself did not indicate the reason why voting was taking place in secret; the signatures of the head and secretary of the Counting Commission were not affixed. But this is such a small thing compared to everything else.

However, there were several more nuances – according to the constitutional procedure, Lutkovskaya could not occupy the position – some of the deputies voted for her not with ballots with wet stamps, but with photocopies – this is a violation; secondly, according to observations, those 252 deputies from the majority who allegedly supported the election of the candidate were not physically present in the Rada, and thirdly, there was only one candidate on the ballot – Lutkovskaya. There is only one explanation for this chaos: Lavrinovich wanted to collect a record number of signatures for his creature. Also, it is no secret that Valeria Vladimirovna did not have the necessary experience in human rights work. And this is a prerequisite for the position of Commissioner.

—

During the appointment period, an unpleasant fact in Valeria Vladimirovna’s biography surfaced. Human rights activist Nikolai Vasilenko spoke about this. It turns out that while working at the Ministry of Justice in 1997, she covered up the corruption schemes of Poltava judge Alexander Bulenko (in 2012, deputy head of the Poltava Court of Appeal Andrey Ryabishin; he resigned of his own free will in 2016 without undergoing recertification). According to Vasilenko, the judge made a guilty decision in a case in which proceedings were not even opened, and the allegedly injured party did not even go to court. The human rights activist notes that he contacted Lutkovskaya about this. She assured that Bulenko acted within the law.

Moreover, on the day of voting for the candidate for the position of ombudsman Valeria Lutkovskaya, People’s Deputy Yuri Karmazin registered an urgent letter to the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Vladimir Lytvyn (more about him: Vladimir Litvin: does Ukraine need a professional Judas? ). In the document, he demanded that her candidacy be immediately withdrawn from consideration by the deputies. The people’s deputy said that Valeria Vladimirovna indicated fake data in her income statement in 2011. Allegedly, she did not contribute all the income she had for that year. According to Karmazin, Lutkovskaya hid the amount from the sale of Audi and Chevrolet cars through the Poliservis V company. We were talking about tens of thousands of dollars. However, it was not just selling cars. According to the people’s deputy, Valeria Vladimirovna drove cars stolen from Europe. Just like her boss Lavrinovich, who found himself at the center of a scandal over his Mercedes Benz GL 420, stolen in Germany.

The fact is that the car numbers in the registration documents were corrected several times. Of course, Litvin checked everything. He showed the opposition official documents “obtained during a special inspection.” Of course, they contained confirmation that the future Commissioner was a crystal honest person.

Despite all this, the newly appointed Commissioner was not tormented by her conscience, and she still read out the Ombudsman’s oath. True, after 4 days of blocking the podium by the opposition, and somehow on the sly, from the corner of the Verkhovna Rada session hall. The words of the oath were not heard, because all the time the opposition chanted: “Ganba!”

Let us note that Lutkovskaya’s oath coincided with a series of terrorist attacks in Dnepropetrovsk.

On the same day, People’s Deputy Yuriy Odarchenko filed a lawsuit against Verkhovna Rada over the illegality of Lutkovskaya’s appointment and the illegality of her oath. But the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine did not find any violations.

Yes, by the way, one of her assistants is Tatyana Lupova, who was brought by Chaplyga. She is engaged in custom-made cleansing of the Internet from negativity against Lutkovskaya. But not only for her. And for many, including her enemies. As well as placing ordered materials against Lutkovskaya’s enemies. Although sometimes everything comes the other way around (mostly at Chaplyga’s request). Then think about it yourselfAnd.

Cases of Commissioner Valeria Lutkovskaya

Valeria Lutkovskaya’s first working day in her new position began with a huge scandal. She came to the Secretariat of the Commissioner for Human Rights on the eve of the May holidays. Her subordinates had a legal day off due to the postponement of working days to weekends. Knowing this very well, the ombudsman promised to fire all employees of the apparatus who did not show up for work. And then she gave the command to call people to work.

Ex-Ombudsman Nina Karpacheva was outraged. She stated that Ms. Lutkovskaya does not know or grossly ignores Ukrainian legislation. In principle, this was not far from the truth. However, heads fell and a personnel purge began. The highest-class professionals left – former judges of the Supreme Court, employees of the prosecutor’s office, employees of the penitentiary service, former ambassadors and diplomats who had worked in the apparatus for more than 10 years since its creation. Within two months, every second person was fired. Lutkovskaya recruited former employees of the Ministry of Justice to fill the vacant positions. Let’s say they are professionals, but certainly not in the field of jurisprudence. Later it became clear that laymen came to positions of professionals (we see the same example in the Ministry of Internal Affairs).

A striking example of Lutkovskaya’s illegal personnel decisions was the dismissal of the former head of the logistics and welfare department of the secretariat, the father of two children, who was on sick leave, Igor Shevchuk. The case reached the Supreme Court of Ukraine. Themis took the side of the illegally dismissed employee. The court decided to reinstate him and pay compensation. But Lutkovskaya, we remind you, a defender of people’s rights, filed a cassation against this decision. At first, the court recognized the cassation as legitimate, but after the coup in 2014, it sided with Shevchuk.

Another innovation under the leadership of Valeria Vladimirovna: Human rights activists appeared in the secretariat, who provided services on a voluntary basis in public organizations. It would seem like a good thing. But in our state everything, one way or another, is connected with corruption. This case is no exception. Human rights activists, who were not chosen by whom, “replaced” the secretariat workers. Logically, they provided their services for free, but in reality they provided them for money. Part, giving them to the government agency that sheltered them.

The newly appointed ombudsman did not forget about the place of Yulia Tymoshenko. Immediately after Lutkovskaya’s appointment, the opposition asked her to check the fact that Yulia Vladimirovna was beaten during transportation from the colony to the Ukrzaliznytsia hospital. She was provided with photographs that showed bruises on Yulia Vladimirovna’s body. The Ombudsman passionately promised to find out everything. First of all, she initiated SBU searches in the offices of her employees. Vladimir Yatsenko, acting head of the ombudsman’s secretariat, reported that the locks in his office were broken, and law enforcement officers did not allow him and his subordinates into the offices. Some employees were summoned to the Kyiv prosecutor’s office to give certain testimony in the case of Yulia Tymoshenko. In particular, they were talking about a photo of the former prime minister with bruises on his body. The Commissioner simply decided to find the sources of the photographs and destroy them, as well as discredit Nina Karpacheva. But it didn’t work out. The SBU and Lutkovskaya denied the facts of searches and interrogations. As a result, Valeria Vladimirovna dealt with the photo of the esoteric prime minister as best she could, declaring “self-beating”, “deception”, etc.

In the case with Tymoshenko, the ombudsman forgot that, based on her job description, her duties include “protecting human rights.” The most unfortunate thing is that Valeria Vladimirovna supported Yulia Tymoshenko when she went on a hunger strike. According to her, Tymoshenko, like any other person, has the right to free expression of views, including through protest in the form of a hunger strike. Lutkovskaya transferred responsibility for the life and health of the politician to the Penitentiary Service. This is truly the highest understanding of human rights.

The Commissioner reacted very “humanely” to Yulia Tymoshenko’s complaint about round-the-clock video recording in her cell. Lutkovskaya stated that the prison department does not film the “intimate sphere” of Yulia Vladimirovna’s life. That is, the cameras do not capture the shower or toilet. Moreover, during medical procedures they are put on special covers.

Valeria Vladimirovna even came to see Tymoshenko in the colony, but the ex-prime minister did not want to meet with her (maybe Lutkovskaya encouraged Poroshenko in advance, knowing how much he dislikes Tymoshenko?)

Let us note that the Ombudsman refused to write to the President a petition for pardon for Yulia Tymoshenko.

Valeria Vladimirovna was not accepted on the world stage. This is evidenced by the special resolution on Ukraine of the annual session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly dated July 8, 2012. The document called on “the Ukrainian authorities to strengthen the position of the ombudsman and ensure that a person with relevant experience in the field of human rights protection remains in this position.” Translated from diplomatic language into generally understandable language, this is a statement of the professional unsuitability of Ombudsman Lutkovskaya.

For the next two years, Valeria Lutkovskaya sat quietly in her chair and approved the necessary laws for the Family.

In 2014, during the events on the Maidan, the ombudsman continued to work, but acted distantly. Regarding the dictatorial laws on amendments to legislation adopted by Parliament on January 16, 2014, she said that they should be the subject of broad public debate. She also expressed deep concern about the events taking place on the street. Grushevsky in the center of Kyiv, and condemned the violence.

However, in 2014, Lutkovskaya did appear in a scandal. She came to the defense of lawyer and top manager Denis Bugai, who was called an accomplice of the wanted Ukrainian oligarch Sergei Kurchenko and one of the main witnesses in his case. He was suspected of large-scale theft of funds from the state budget of Ukraine, the transfer of billions of dollars of Yanukovych’s “family” abroad, and the fall of Brokbusinessbank. The Ombudsman resorted to a not very legal method – blocking the detainee from going to court. By the way, all this happened on a day off. Of course, Valeria Vladimirovna explained her behavior as a violation of human rights.

On Sunday evening, near the SBU pre-trial detention center, Lutkovskaya communicates with D. Bugai’s support group

But there was a nuance in such an ardent defense – Bugai had a connection not only with Kurchenko, but also with Dmitry Firtash (information about him: DMITRY FIRTASH. HISTORY OF TERNOPIL BILLIONAIRE). Denis Bugay and lawyers from his law firm have repeatedly defended Firtash’s interests in legal disputes. So the detention of the lawyer was unprofitable not only for Kurchenko, but also for Firtash. From everything that is happening, it is clear that Bugai is the right person. Therefore, Firtash turned to Valeria Lutkovskaya. Why Firtash? It’s all about old connections: Alexander Lavrynovych is the main person in Firtash’s group –Levochkina. As a result, Denis Bugai was released.

Valeria Lutkovskaya: Apolitical ombudsman and her “friends”

The actively promoted lustration of officials from the Yanukovych era did not affect Valeria Vladimirovna. This is very strange, because the current government, during the appointment of Lutkovskaya to the post of ombudsman, was in opposition and screamed at the top of its lungs about illegality. Apparently, a pliable Commissioner is very beneficial to them.

After Euromaidan, Valeria Vladimirovna became apolitical. She zealously defends the rights of Ukrainians. From the main points: the Ombudsman called on Ukraine not to stop paying pensions to pensioners in the ATO zone, several times turned to her Russian colleague Ella Pamfilova with a request to organize an examination of Nadezhda Savchenko by Ukrainian doctors, and asked to block access to the “Peacemaker” website due to the publication of personal data.

Valeria Lutkovskaya got herself a representative on the social network Facebook. Of course not openly. Valeria Vladimirovna’s “mouthpiece” was her assistant, head of the press service Mikhail Chaplyga, better known under the nickname “Anarchist Mikha”.

UPDATE: Chyplyga responded to our publication. I really decided that the site Skelet.Info belongs to Avakov:

He is generally quite expressive:

This person actively appeared during the scandal with the “Peacemaker” website. He, like Lutkovskaya (or rather, on her behalf), advocated the closure of the center. It is closure, that is, for the complete removal of the entire base of 62,000 terrorists and their accomplices. Mikha the Anarchist allegedly found incriminating evidence on the site’s employees and volunteers and threw mud at them.

Chaplyga is rude online, sends away everyone who disagrees with him, writes illiterately and in some kind of slang. A lot of Kremlin propaganda comes up in the chronicle.

He does not forget to publicly insult the President of Ukraine and, at the same time, to write with respect the positions and full names of the Russian leadership with a capital letter.

It is not difficult to understand the political preferences of the Ukrainian civil servant, who is the right hand of Valeria Lutkovskaya. Although, at first glance, he acts as a kind of “conciliator.” However, this is a quality trick. Mikha is an agent of influence, his task is to promote the messages that Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) needs, a la “peace to the world,” “enough with blood,” and “stop the civil war and the bloody ATO.”

Valeria Lutkovskaya. “Pocket” ombudsman

Let us note that in the spring of 2016 he took part in a closed reception of the Institute of Peace, which was sponsored by Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism).

—

Valeria Lutkovskaya’s five-year term of office expires this spring. Parliament will have to decide when to appoint an ombudsman. But something tells us that Lutkovskaya herself has every chance of remaining in her place.

Arina Dmitrieva, for Skelet.Info

Subscribe to our channels at Telegram, Facebook, CONT, VK And YandexZen – only dossiers, biographies and incriminating evidence on Ukrainian officials, businessmen, politicians from the section CRYPT!