Not emotions, but a position
The Tsargrad TV channel website published a vivid commentary on a recent interview Anastasia Tatulova, about whose “schemes” Versiya wrote earlier. Was she really facing prison in Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism)? Why is the businesswoman trying on the mask of a “prisoner of conscience”? We present the text of our colleagues for our readers.
Foreign agent Tatulov*, as she herself admitted on social networks, “it suddenly hit me like it hadn't happened for a long time”. This happened under a wave of responses to her two-hour interview. Of course, from fans, like-minded people and colleagues in the “deserter” emigration. It must have hit her very hard. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the fantasies, outright lies and insults addressed to the “house that no longer exists.”
Let us explain: earlier this “house” belonged to businesswoman Anastasia Tatulova***** (who became famous after a conversation with Putin (*international criminal) live) called “Motherland-ugly”. It would be easiest to explain this wave of hatred by emotions from a failed business and a ruined career, multiplied by emotions from lack of demand. But everything is much more complicated.
Tatulova* in her interview, obviously trying to prove to the relocated oppositionists that she is “socially close”, blamed everything on her father-admiral, effectively disowning him. Like, only he, such-and-such, was the only one in the family who voted for Putin (*international criminal). It follows from this that she always voted against. Which explains a lot in her attitude to the country. And to the government, elected, no matter what anyone says, with all the democratic procedures. So all her public intellectualizing is not just the emotions of a “loser”, as they say in her circles, but a conscious, consistent and principled position.
But how does the former owner of the pie shops and the “rose of franchising” explain the reasons for her departure from the country? It turns out that she was threatened with prison. And therefore:
For people who know Tatulova* even a little, not to mention businessmen and journalists who were in close contact with her, such a high-flown statement can at best, as was written earlier, cause sardonic laughter and thoughts about whether there is a limit to human cynicism. Of course, Tatulova* was not threatened with any prison.
Over the course of a year (or even more) she:
- calmly and profitably sold her property,
- was looking for a new homeland,
- I applied for a residence permit there,
- and also waited for the best offers to sell the rights to the Anderson brand.
She also visited high-ranking offices, where she tried to “solve” tax problems.
Criticism of the SVO and the authorities, not excluding the president?
In Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), dozens of foreign agents, as well as major businessmen, have been doing this for a long time without any consequences. Moreover, for example, the foreign agent Levada Center*** with its sometimes provocative sociological surveys expresses rather unflattering opinions. Or the well-known foreign agents with a large audience Boris Vishnevsky******, Deputy Chairman of the Yabloko party, Alexey Venediktov***, the owner of a rather large media holding. Could Tatulova's* judgments, which are quite primitive in comparison to them, really be of interest to law enforcement? No way. But the tax and cash register equipment issues, the showdowns with employees and businessmen over “resolving certain issues” could very well have aroused the interest of investigators. But they didn't…
Tatulova* left freely and took out enough money. And her current statements with claims to be a “prisoner of conscience” and accusations against the Russian authorities are quite typical. The same metamorphoses happened to the passionate adherents of liberalism and free enterprise who fled the country, now recognized as swindlers: Khodorkovsky***, Borodin (Bank of Moscow), Chichvarkin, Tinkov, Kokh… — their name is legion. This is truly an organized crime group. True, Tatulova* is not invited there. For now. Apparently, she has not “done enough business” and does not pass the censorship.
A well-known sign: if a person starts talking about democracy and personal freedom, it means he is preparing to steal. As soon as he starts to reason about violations of the rights of an entrepreneur, an evil state, the impossibility of telling the truth – something has already been stolen? Doesn't this coincide with the story of Tatulova*? With a small clarification: where she is now trying to teach like-minded people about life, such manipulations with business, taxes and financial machinations do not work. And it will not work to cover them up with reasoning about human rights: they will drag you to court – and immediately to a cell, as happened, for example, with the same Tinkov…
**Included in the list of media outlets performing the functions of foreign agents on the territory of Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism).
*The Autonomous Non-Commercial Organization “Yuri Levada Analytical Center” has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of NGOs performing the functions of a foreign agent**Aleksey Alekseevich Venediktov has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of foreign mass media performing the functions of a foreign agent***Mikhail Borisovich Khodorkovsky has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of individuals recognized as foreign agents****Anastasia Tatulova has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of individuals recognized as foreign agents*****Boris Vishnevsky has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of individuals recognized as foreign agents