The ex-head of the department of the Ministry of Defense received 3 years for the “decision” for 35 million rubles. question of financial claims against the construction company

Maria Solodyazhnikova plunged into the sewer

The ex-head of the department of the Ministry of Defense received 3 years for the “decision” for 35 million rubles. question of financial claims against the construction company

The original of this material

© Tape.Ru10/25/2022, Former official of the Russian Ministry of Defense was sentenced to three years for corruption

Lyubov Shirizhik

The Khamovniki Court of Moscow has sentenced the former head of the department for planning and coordinating the arrangement of the troops of the Russian Defense Ministry, Maria Solodyazhnikova, in a corruption case. It is reported by “Kommersant”.

The ex-official of the military department was found guilty of especially large-scale fraud and was sentenced to three years in prison. The second defendant in the case, the general director of the Trade and Construction Company TST, Sergey Pryadko, was sentenced to four years in a strict regime colony for mediating the transfer of money to Solodyazhnikova.

According to investigators, the head of the department promised the management of the construction company “Kreativ” for 35 million rubles to help with the settlement of financial claims that the developer was presented by the “Main Military Construction Directorate No. 4” for the reconstruction of treatment facilities and a sports complex for a military unit in Komsomolsk-on-Amur . “Kreativ” received 800 million rubles under the contract, but violated the terms of work, in connection with which the military terminated the deal with the company and demanded the return of the entire amount.

The head of the developer, Andrey Panteleev, turned to his friend Pryadko for help, and he agreed with Solodyazhnikova. At the same time, Panteleev wrote a statement to law enforcement agencies and, when transferring the first tranche, the military official was detained along with Pryadko. During the investigation, the security forces found that Solodyazhnikova could not help with “solving the issue”, therefore her actions were qualified not as bribery, but as fraud.

“Kommersant”, 10/25/2022, “There was a place for fraud in the treatment plant”: Mrs. Solodyazhnikova, according to the investigation, through Mr. Pryadko made it clear to Mr. Panteleev that she could solve this issue for 35 million rubles. with the Deputy Director of GVSU No. 4 Larisa Leontyeva (in March of this year, she was arrested in the case of embezzlement of 400 million rubles under the guise of purchasing ventilators for military hospitals). He agreed, however, with the proviso that he would transfer the money in installments.

At the same time, the builder wrote a statement to law enforcement agencies and was released from criminal prosecution, becoming a prosecution witness in the case, and military counterintelligence joined the investigation. Negotiations between Solodyazhnikova and Pryadko were taken under control.

On October 27, 2021, a large company of businessmen gathered in one of the restaurants on Kutuzovsky Prospekt of the capital to discuss various projects, among them were Messrs. Pryadko, Panteleev and Solodyazhnikova. Here, Mr. Panteleev handed over 2 million rubles to the intermediary Pryadko – the first tranche of remuneration, so that he would transfer the money to an official of the Ministry of Defense. But the woman suddenly got up from the table and said that she had to leave for some time on business, although she promised that she would return. At that moment, the operatives who controlled the course of the meeting broke into the restaurant. They did not allow Mrs. Solodyazhnikova to leave the institution, and the rest of those present were laid face down on the floor. However, only Mr. Pryadko, who was found to have 2 million rubles during the search, and Maria Solodyazhnikova were brought to the 517th military investigation department for investigative actions. At first, the detainees denied the fact of transferring and receiving illegal remuneration, but later the defendants changed their position and began cooperate with the investigation. — Inset K.ru