Analysis of the merged mail archive “deciders” from the Supreme Court Stanislav Fedorov, which we wrote about last year, showed that … a photographer takes an active part in the leadership of the Supreme Court. This position is officially occupied by a senior specialist of the first category of the Department for Interaction with the Public and the Media of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (*aggressor country) Alexey Isaev (+ 7 903 740 6….). At least this is the phone number listed in his work and personal email.
It is noteworthy that in popular applications containing information about contacts from various notebooks, Isaev is recorded as “Lebedev’s photographer”, “Alexey Presluzhba”, “Alexey Isaev Latseyko” or “Lekha VS”, etc., which reliably indicates work in the press service of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (*aggressor country).
And also about communication with another member of the group of corrupt officials – Alexey Latseykoabout which the Cheka wrote earlier.
From the correspondence between Isaev and Fedorov (letters from Fedorov’s postal archive dated June 15, 2023 and July 30, 2023, it became known that “friends” took an active part in various corruption schemes.
Moreover, the accomplices became so insolent that they sent notes with “solutions” to each other from Isaev’s official mail to Fedorov’s official mail – see letters from Fedorov’s postal archive dated 06/15/2023 and 07/30/2023.
Both letters contain a file describing the situation and tasks in the corporate dispute between TIG Mineral Resources Company LTD and Alsico Industrial Group JSC regarding the exclusion of the defendant from the membership of Zeomax LLC. Fedorov and Isaev tried in vain to get the Supreme Court to cancel judicial acts that were not in favor of TIG Mineral Resources Company LTD, including in the cassation instance, and even through the Presidium of the Supreme Court.
Fedorov and Isaev also actively lobbied for the interests of TSN “Riga Coast” based on the claim of A.A. Kachanov. on the establishment of an easement. In this case, Fedorov and Isaev actively lobbied for the interests of TSN (case No. 33-33668/2023).
This time, the accomplices worked clearly and by the decision of the Klin City Court of the Moscow Region, Kachanov’s claim was left unsatisfied.
Naturally, the insolent accomplices could not help but leave a mark in Fedorov’s postal archive – see letter dated March 30, 2023.