Cashier of oligarch Yevtushenkov at the FSB Vladimir Sadovnikov
At the troubled oligarch Vladimir Yevtushenkova, who soared into the Forbes rating under Luzhkov and was arrested under Sechin for schemes with the Bashneft company, there is a well-established system of legalization and laundering of proceeds from crime, informed sources of the editorial office report.
Under the auspices of the former employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation, who led the commission on SORM, and now the vice president of MTS PJSC Vladimir Sadovnikov, a group of cashiers, consisting mainly of former security officials, works. The main beneficiary of MTS is the same billionaire Yevtushenkov – gave complete carte blanche to Sadovnikov’s group.
Gardeners at Yevtushenkova – mr cash
Officially, Sadovnikov Vladimir Fedorovich is Vice President for Corporate Security and Regime of MTS PJSC. He is also a member of the executive committee of the Association of Documentary Telecommunications, headed by obedient Arkady Kremer.
Friend Arkady will work everything out
What does the cashing scheme look like in MTS? The resolution of one of the main problems in cashing out, as a “breaking” of the purpose of payment for construction companies, became possible due to the presence in the structure of AFK Sistema (which includes MTS PJSC) – its own credit institution (MTS Bank, in a pocket bank YevtushenkThe scheme is covered by investment vice-president Gleb Sorokin, the interlocutors report) and a company that has construction OKVED (JSC Russian Telephone Company).
From the wiretap: “Glebushka asks for some bread”
The client (construction company) makes a payment with the designation of the payment “Construction and Construction Works” or “For Construction Materials” to the details of MTS PJSC, where the payment is met by the necessary employee in the Bank, who receives letters prepared in advance for the client with a request to change the purpose of the payment to “Under the contract supplies.” As a result, it becomes formally possible for the Bank not to reject the client’s payment due to the inconsistency of the payment for “CEW” or “Construction Materials” and not to request the relevant documents (contracts, etc.). Subsequently, under a fake “delivery agreement” with MTS PJSC, phones and other products of MTS PJSC are shipped to retailers who, in fact, pay for the purchased products in cash, which, minus the “commission” of 16%, are returned to the client.
Thus, the client gets the opportunity to cash out funds under imaginary contracts for construction and installation works or the purchase of building materials, without realizing that he “de jure” purchased phones.
Of course, this scheme would not have a long-term perspective, without the corresponding above-mentioned patron, who is referred to by the organizers and performers of the “brilliant” plan.
